Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti specs and performance figures leaked, AMD "Big Navi" performance comparison also included

[Redaktion]

Thanks to the information compiled by Tom from Moore's Law Is Dead, we now have an almost clear picture of the RTX 3080 Ti, complete with specs and estimated performance gains over Turing GPUs. Furthermore, Tom reveals additional info on AMD's upcoming RDNA2-based "Big Navi" high-end GPUs, which looks to be ready to go head to head with the high-end Ampere GPUs.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Nvidia-GeForce-RTX-3080-Ti-specs-and-performance-figures-leaked-AMD-Big-Navi-performance-comparison-also-included.464852.0.html

[william blake]

oh no, "moore's law" is the biggest noob&fanatic in a whole youtube.

[orlynow]

Sounds totally legit.

In all sincerity, I'd LOVE this all to be true. But this is exactly the opposite of the rigour in your reviews.

[riklaunim]

Ad revenue must be down...

[Spunjji]

"Sources" = some guy on YouTube... okay then?

[DF]

So if it's so very good as this, why is Hopper set to replace it in less than a year?

[Mw]

Moores Law is an excellent YouTuber and has multiple great sources in the industry. Been on the money multiple times in the past.

[_MT_]

So if it's so very good as this, why is Hopper set to replace it in less than a year?

If it indeed is, then it's because they feel AMD is too close which might force them to lower prices or dig into reserves of the design right at launch instead of mid-cycle shortening the lifespan.

[Vraelon]

So... We are trusting a guy that puts an poorly photoshoped 3 fan reference blower in his thumbnail... Right?

[eTeternal]

Can we get a confirmation of "DisplayPort 2.0" actually being a fact of inclusion or are we just floating this as an assumption?

[Evilpaul666]

Well, no EUV 7nm, ~300W not ~220, AV1 codec not the other, and just about everything else was wrong, too. Maybe don't post this guy's BS again in two years?