Quote from: name on May 10, 2020, 12:12:04
Not saying 4800U is bad. It pretty much destroys and spits on the intel U-series processors (including ice lake). But 10750H is a 6 core part. 10875 is the 8 core part. Sure equalizing another chip with 1/3 of the TDP is crazy but don't muddle the specifics.
Well, according to the following article:
https://www.notebookcheck.com/i7-10875H-vs-i7-10750H_11949_11708.247552.0.html
The 10875 scores in Firestrike Physics are as following:
min: 21113 avg: 21399 median: 21426 (73%) max: 21658 points
So, that's roughly 9% better than 4800U in Yoga Slim... which doesn't really look good for Intel since AMD comes within 10% of Intels' H processor rated at 45W TDP (but will draw MUCH more) vs 27W TDP unlocked 4800U (if I'm not mistaken, the Lenovo Yoga Slim uses the TDP UNLOCKED version of 4800U allowing it to stretch all the way to its maximum of 27W - unless of course they changed the specs and constricted it back to 15W, but nothing was mentioned in that regard).
So, we're talking about 27W vs 45W at 9% performance difference (and stronger iGP on AMD side) for about 40% lower power draw on 4800U.
The fact AMD was able to cram 8 cores and 16 threads into a low power SKU speaks volumes.
Intel is still stuck with 4 cores and 8 threads (tops) in that power envelope... and remember that Intel's TDP only counts mostly for stock clocks... not turbo (which make the Intel version draw A LOT more power).
Generally speaking, with Zen 2, AMD also exceeds its TDP, but it stays much closer to it than Intel does...