AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and Ryzen 5 3600XT benchmarks leak: Comet Lake S Core i9-10900K and Core i7-10700K take a single-core beating despite 500 MHz higher clockspeed

[Redaktion]

Benchmarks have just leaked for the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT. These chips beat the Comet Lake S i9-10900K and i7-10700K respectively in Cinebench R20's single-core test.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ryzen-9-3900XT-and-Ryzen-5-3600XT-benchmarks-leak-Comet-Lake-S-Core-i9-10900K-and-Core-i7-10700K-take-a-single-core-beating-despite-500-MHz-higher-clockspeed.466823.0.html

[Wildcard]

The alleged multi-threaded benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 3800XT and 3900XT are 5,297 and 7,479 respectively.

Source: Member psps3 from the aforementioned forum.

[Dharan]

fake

[Wumbo]

Stop!  He's already dead!

[JS]

Intel is dead ... Long live our new master... AMD

[BarryDipper]

Shouldn't this be impossible without some serious gains in IPC for AMD?

I know AMD had an IPC advantage over Intel, but a 3950x (which can get to 4.8GHz) doesn't get anywhere near that single core.

Would be fantastic if the XT are literally updated chips, vs things like Intel ks chips that are just overvolted k chips.

[Cooe]

No. That isn't needed. The R9-3950X hits 4.7GHz, not 4.8GHz and generally doesn't land toooo far off these scores (≈525-535). And there's a good chance this new chip stepping (what it almost surely is) can sustain the max single-core boost clocks for longer.

[Hbhbhbhb]

Just intel

[Gorkem]

Fake AF.
The source of thatscores is a BS site called cpu-monkety.
What they do is basially autogenerate Cinebench scores based on the technical specifications of SKUs. And that's very, very misleading.
Jesus they even have 4700G scores.

[Puhp]

uh oh.....XTREMELY butt-hurt Intel fanbois incoming, as usual.  Clinging to their 3fps advantage at 1440p or above that they paid $100s extra for  ;D