Amazon has world's cheapest AMD Ryzen 7 4800H and RTX 2060-powered Asus laptop for pre-order at an incredible US$1199

[Alex554]

this is "appropriately priced", but it's by no means cheap.

lowest price on the market or close to it=cheap.
you call it appropriately priced? fine. what is cheap then?

lmfao
It's the ONLY 4800H laptop out there at the moment. Of course it's the "lowest price on the market". Because there's literally no competition rn.
And yes, I'm not counting Intel because their i9 pricing is absurd. I'm saying it's "not cheap" by AMD standards.

[brownfox]

I will consider this laptop a big scam from Asus if display is not 3/5ms response time.

[Alex544]

this is "appropriately priced", but it's by no means cheap.

lowest price on the market or close to it=cheap.
you call it appropriately priced? fine. what is cheap then?

And to answer your question, $1000 would be considered cheap. That's what China has it selling for and what it should be priced in the US as well if it weren't for these bad times.

[william blake]

lmfao
It's the ONLY 4800H laptop out there at the moment. Of course it's the "lowest price on the market". Because there's literally no competition rn.
And yes, I'm not counting Intel because their i9 pricing is absurd. I'm saying it's "not cheap" by AMD standards.

renoir>>>picasso, what a surprise.
this combination of hardware(yes we can count 8 fast cores without naming a manufacturer) is the cheapest but not cheap?
i'd better buy something more expensive to make the deal better. sounds really strange, dont you think?

[Dmc5967]

Bob of all Trades on You Tube yesterday reviewed the Asus Tuf 506 Ryzen 7 4800h with gtx 1660ti, big problems with the display which he predicts many people returning the laptop.... Hopefully Asus will find a fix otherwise I'm sticking with Intel, which should see prices dropping.....

[Alex544]

lmfao
It's the ONLY 4800H laptop out there at the moment. Of course it's the "lowest price on the market". Because there's literally no competition rn.
And yes, I'm not counting Intel because their i9 pricing is absurd. I'm saying it's "not cheap" by AMD standards.

renoir>>>picasso, what a surprise.
this combination of hardware(yes we can count 8 fast cores without naming a manufacturer) is the cheapest but not cheap?
i'd better buy something more expensive to make the deal better. sounds really strange, dont you think?

Is it really a better deal? You're paying $200 more for 2 more cores, but a huge downgrade in screen quality.
I don't know why you're trying to argue. $1200 is undeniably way less appealing than $1000.

[Driz]

According to an ASUS reply to amazon regarding this laptop the RTX 2060 is 6GB and not a 'MAX-Q'

"This model comes with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 GDDR6 6GB."

Does this make a difference to all the max-q is a 1660ti replies?