I don't really get these chargers. I understand that it's convenient to be able to top up a phone in a jiffy, especially if it won't last the day. However, such chargers are hard on the cell ("battery"). Even with a 5 Ah cell, which some phones have, 30 W is well in excess of 1 C charging rate. That's not good. Not to mention that the more you hammer a cell in the constant current phase of charging, the sooner you hit voltage limit and charging is going to slow down. Cells are annoying in that way. That's why they never quote time to 100 % charge in their advertising. It's still pretty long. And there is really nothing you can do about it other than reducing nominal capacity. Meaning, it works well when you want to top up from a low state of charge, but not that well when your phone already has a decent charge and you want to top up before going away for a longer period.
If you're a desk rat like me, slow wireless charging is better. Well, it would be better if you could set up a charging limit. Let's say 80 %. Because Li-ion cells don't like being kept too charged. When you sleep for 7 hours and spend 8 hours at the office, a phone can spend most of the day on a charger. Having 80 % when leaving office is pretty good. Even better would be simple pin and pad. Having pads on the bottom of the phone and a charging station with pins in it into which you can just drop the phone. Like my first phone back in the late 90s, Siemens SL10 I believe. Unlike wireless charging, it's not universal (nothing is stopping development of a standard), but it's more efficient (less heat, less waste). It keeps the desk tidy, the phone is standing up so you can see the display. I never understood why such charging stations never became the standard. It was a wonderful thing.