More evidence points towards AMD's RDNA2 Big Navi superiority over Nvidia's high-end Ampere RTX 3000 GPUs

[John Mayer]

This is fine and all but DLSS proves to be a gamechanger, AMD needs to come with a solution of their own to combat it.

FidelityFX CAS anyone? performs exactly like dlss 2.0 quality mode, but has slightly sharper images and is easier to implement. check death stranding on PC, you can compare both there. DLSS is impressive, no question, but the blind fanboying over it has gotten out of hand. It's also funny when people talk like if it was a special hardware feature, you only need a GPU capable of doing fp16 intructions :)

You're comparing apples with oranges, you clearly don't understand what the fuzz about DLSS is a about, it's far more than aliasing, it scales low resolution up to high resolution using AI and without major quality loss, which means you get enormous frame rate boosts as numerous videos have shown already. You clearly dont know anything about it. This is not fanboy talk, the videos prove it how amazing this new technology is, period!

[Sean Sean]

This article is total clickbait and ill-informed.

It has already been established Nvidia is way ahead on the 5nm game. In fact, it is so far ahead that AMD may not even have a fighting chance for up to two years because Nvidia has purchased almost all 5nm foundry fabrication in advance, globally (not even just at one or two) leaving AMD, literally quite physically, no way to produce 5nm other than on a few handful of ultra premium cards.

In addition, Nvidia's 12/14nm was exceptionally competitive with AMD's 7nm while so Nvidia going to 7nm, even if AMD did try to move to 5nm would still leave Nvidia with the crown unless some truly groundbreaking technology improvements occur on AMD's end, which is well established to be incredibly unlikely.

In addition, current info points at Nvidia Ampere already being a serious performance problem for RDNA2.

At least do some basic research before you post these silly articles.

Lmao. It seems like they only thing that you've done is basic research.

Way ahead with 5nm? Just because the started buying capacity at TSMC does not mean that they are really ahead. AMD has a very strong partnership with TSMC, and I am sure that AMD will have the 5nm capacity that they need when it comes time. Nvidia failed secure any of TSMC's 7nm capacity because they thought they could pay a premium for
it, and they were wrong. It is highly likely that Nvidia's Ampere will be stuck on Samsung's 8nm, until TSMC has available 7nm capacity. Node for node, Samsung's 8nm is insufficient to counter TSMC's 7nm + or 7nm EUV (one of which is likely end up in RDNA 2). Nvidia has billions of dollars and a huge work force that they can tap into, AMD's Radeon division is microscopic by comparison, and it was not until recently that AMD had the funds to actually compete with Nvidia. AMD cut into Intel's thick skin and could very well do the same to Nvidia in the next couple of years.