Good news. Since the P1 series dropped to maximum RAM from 96 GB back to 64 GB, this P14s / P16s series remains, only P16 non-s goes to 192 GB RAM. But in AI / LLM and data privacy times, we need the P14s / P16s series to support up to 128 GB RAM at this point (and the T series may be up to 96 GB RAM).

Quote from: HDPacks on Today at 02:02:38Isn't 10,000 series Zen 6 and 11,000 series Zen 7??

Maybe they're reserving 10k for something else. Sorta like how they went 7k -> 9k for desktop CPUs then released the 8k desktop APU series. Or how they went 3k -> 5k desktop CPUs and the 4k was released as a mobile laptop APU series.

Nobody can really explain the logic behind AMDs naming or marketing decisions. It's truly something special.

I think if they're releasing zen 6 desktop this late (2027), it's almost guaranteed that consoles will get delayed too. Consoles almost never get the latest cpu architecture when they just launch but wait a year or more so they can get cheaper pricing. So I'm expecting PS6 2028 now.

Contra: -verlöteter RAM

Trifft zwar zu, aber ist eben auch dem Prinzip geschuldet.
Warum wird vom gleichen Autor, das nicht ständig bei jedem neuen Macbook angekreidet? Das gibt schon ein ordentliches Geschmäckle...

Quote from: LolROFL on Yesterday at 12:05:14The scientism is just a modern form of religion/control.

But it's good to de-industrialize ones economic competitor enemies ;)

QuoteOn the laptop side, the Zen 6-based Medusa Point

If Medusa Point is based on RDNA4 and comes without transformer model based upscaling, which NVIDIA introduced some time ago already and NVIDIA's N1(X) APU is a thing this year already, I'm not sure I'd be interested in Medusa Point much. Not even talking about CUDA. Also, AMD needs to catch-up to NVIDIA' ray-tracing and path-tracing power efficiency:
pcgameshardware.de/Radeon-RX-9070-XT-Grafikkarte-281023/Tests/vs-RTX-5070-Ti-5080-Release-Benchmark-Overclocking-1467630/3:
Right now, depending on the game, NVIDIA is 1.3 to 2.88 times more energy efficient in path-tracing, the more path-tracing-heavy a game is, the more behind is AMD.
5070 Ti is 300 Watt TDP
RX 9070 XT is 304 Watt TDP
As such, one can compare the FPS/Watt on that table easily. RDNA4 improved nicely over RDNA3 in path-tracing power efficiency, but is still behind NVIDIA by quite a lot (several GPU generations or one could also say several full node jumps (a node jump is a 25% to 33% power efficiency improvement)). So, if you care about path-tracing (not to be confused with ray-tracing) (in ray-tracing AMD is still behind, tho, by like 1 GPU generation or 1.26 times on average, according to the table), the choice to get a NVIDIA GPU is clear.