Unless it's intel igpu

They should just use ThinkPad mechanical keyboards with the red dot/trackpoint across their entire range.

QuoteThere is simply no fanless alternative in the Windows camo with decent performance figures.

This may be the elephant in the room. The industry behind Windows needs to up their game, because even I'm about to buy an Air 15 M5 after researching all kind of Windows laptops first.
Funny how on YouTube Just Josh in "Best Gaming Laptops of 2025 (ft. Jarrod's Tech!)" (youtube.com/watch?v=J0sbQR0ET3s) brought a MacBook Air for taking notes, etc. (he shows it in the video at some point), while the video itself is about Window gaming laptops.

Non-PWM 120 Hz OLED would delete Windows laptops, if it doesn't increase the price. But OLED may be less power efficient and would either reduce the battery time or would need a bigger or energy denser, more expensive, battery? Any what about the burn-in on static content? Also, I'd prefer IPS over PWM OLED implementation any time. Maybe PHOLED' higher energy efficiency can help Apple bring OLED sooner. But using OLED, the price could easily increase by 200 (at least based on other companies configuration options), which is too much. Maybe a 90 Hz OLED would be cheaper. Honestly, if they bring a 120 Hz IPS and reduce the pixel response times accordingly (1/120 = 8.33ms ideally), that would be a very solid improvement until OLED is actually ripe to be used by the massing in all kind of (harsh) conditions. But maybe OLED is already close to it.

Increasing the key travel by even 0.1mm to 0.2mm would make it so much better.

Soldered RAM is fine for this kind of laptop, but in times of AI/LLMs and data privacy, offering a 48 GB RAM option would be nice (because the iGPU becoming faster with each generation (=faster prompt processing), as the memory bandwidth becomes faster too (=faster token generation)).

If the Air 15 was 0.3 to 0.4 lbs lighter, that would be a major improvement, too.

Who cares? This is a great technology, and I'm glad that Nvidia is giving us the option to use it. If you don't like it, don't use it. It's that simple. The AI haters are delusional clowns. Gamers are quick try and download graphics mods for games to achieve the same effect  anyways!!!

Verbrenneraus war geplant für 2035.

Wenn man 10 Jahre zurückschaut gab es bei BMW für 36.500 Euro einen i3 mit netto unter 30 kWh Batterie, 50kw DC, 150 PS und einer WLTP-Reichweite von 235 km. Ein BMW 330i kostete damals ab 43.500 Euro.
Hausstrom kostete laut KI damals 30ct, Super 1.30. 100 km Nach WLTP inkl Ladeverlust also etwa 5 vs etwas 9 Euro. Für etwas mehr Geld bekam man also viel mehr Auto, PS und Reichweite.


Heute kostet ein i3 50 ca 65.000 Euro mit 469  PS, 400kw DC und 900km WLTP. Ein 330i mit "nur" 258 PS und 800km WLTP-Reichweite kostet 61.000 Euro, ein M340i mit 340 PS 77.000 Euro. 100 km kosten 5 vs 14 Euro. Als Laternenlader mit Abo (bezahlt durch die Kfz-Steuer) 7,5 vs 14 Euro.

Ich bekomme also für 4.000 Euro Aufpreis 200 Mehr PS und in der Realität etwas geringere Reichweite dafür wesentlich geringere laufende Kosten. Es wird nicht mehr lange dauern, da hat es sich vollständig umgedreht.

In 10 Jahren wären es wirklich nur noch Türkei-Urlauber mit Wohnwagen, deren Bedarf durch ein e-Auto ggf. nicht vollständig gedeckt werden könnte.