Quote from: Daniel Schmidt on June 08, 2026, 07:51:21Quote from: Aa on June 06, 2026, 03:27:18The battery test makes absolutely no sense. Every other major phone benchmark site (eg GMSarena, phone arena, etc) has this phone compared to it's peers much higher on the battery test. There's absolutely no way this phone has 1,700 more mAh than the magic8 lite and has 8 hours of battery less on the wifi test. It even gets out performed by some 5,000 mAh phone. It really just doesn't make any sense.
Have you folks considered running the battery test? I've read virtually every battery benchmark available on this phone online, and this one here is by far the most extreme outlier.
Quote from: Uadud on June 07, 2026, 02:08:15This.. just doesn't make sense. How does it have the same battery wifi test score as the Poco x7 pro when it has 2,500 more mah? Both use almost identical LTPS screens, same PPI, same resolution. Not to mention the 9500s is built on a 3nm SoC so the low usage on social medial/internet tasks should be much more efficient than the Poco x7 pro.. and it also has 2,500 more mah..?
I'm going to wait for the next update and then repeat the test. However, the idle test result is also slightly lower. I think the Wi-Fi module consumes a lot of power.
The wi-fi module cant be THIS power heavy and unoptimized. It just doesnt make sense. Other sources (eg gmsarena, phonearena) have shown its slightly inefficient in wifi tests compared to more expensive (eg x9 find pro) peers, but that is more likely due to the LTPS. Ive read probably every wifi battery benchmark that exists online for this phone, and this review is by far and wide the biggest outlier. I would investigate personally and see if you guys got a defective model.
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar