Text only | Text with Images

NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => News => Topic started by: Redaktion on February 12, 2024, 17:12:51

Title: Skull and Bones as the first "AAAA" game: Ubisoft justifies high price by inventing a new level of quality
Post by: Redaktion on February 12, 2024, 17:12:51
After the open beta, players have mixed feelings about the new pirate MMO Skull and Bones. Ubisoft is still more than convinced and justifies the high price by attributing a whole new level of quality to the game.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Skull-and-Bones-as-the-first-AAAA-game-Ubisoft-justifies-high-price-by-inventing-a-new-level-of-quality.802632.0.html
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first \
Post by: svv on February 12, 2024, 22:16:35
Far Cry meets naval missions from AC
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first \
Post by: Mr Majestyk on February 13, 2024, 07:50:51
More like CCCC game. Garbagely dumbed down and several years late minus many of the promised features and graphics nothing like they showed several years ago.

Youbecrap is more apt name.
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first
Post by: Dan6 on February 13, 2024, 16:07:07
So now we need to pay more if we want to actually receive a finished, well tested game with all promised content?
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first \
Post by: Tuktuk on February 13, 2024, 19:43:31
this looks genuinely awful..... how are they justifying this....
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first \
Post by: DoBetter on February 13, 2024, 20:51:05
The author of this article should be ashamed of his misrepresentation. I hope Ubi sues you for slander. There is more to walking around on shore than just changing your clothes. Child-journalist.
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first
Post by: Mr. Shallow on February 14, 2024, 07:09:00
Well, none of the character models seem to have sexy asses so this gets a pass.
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first \
Post by: Roger douglas on February 17, 2024, 12:45:07
Silly ubisoft doesnt even know the tier list. Clearly S comes after a++ or aaa
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first \
Post by: Zachary Carr on February 17, 2024, 19:03:34
The Beta was so terrible I will never give it another chance
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first
Post by: Dona on February 18, 2024, 02:14:19
Game is actual garbage Assasins Creed Black Flag came out in 2013 and is infinitely better in every single aspect of the game.

Calling this a AAAA game has to be satire and the executive who said that hasn't even seen the damb game
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first \
Post by: Drefsav on February 18, 2024, 15:30:41
This is never a AAAA game. Black flag was much better and fun to play and I'd not pay this price for black flag.

Recently Ubisoft said people need to get used to the idea of not owning games. Well you know what I'm getting used to the idea of not owning Ubisoft games.

Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first \
Post by: Dustin on February 18, 2024, 20:38:04
I think you meant the first ASSS game.
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first
Post by: Stew on February 18, 2024, 21:30:47
Yeah, not picking this up for full price. Not worth it. For me, its average at best.
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first \
Post by: PK on February 19, 2024, 03:02:16
Ubi has no shame. That will backfire for sure.
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first \
Post by: Chris Hawthorne on February 19, 2024, 16:33:33
Lol this game is trash and shame on you for suggesting otherwise. Go use the money they bribed you with to get some standards for yourself
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first \
Post by: AnotherMike on February 19, 2024, 19:59:30
Hey Ubisoft, news flash: wasting money in development hell for over a decade does not equate to high budget production value. AAAA my a**.
Title: Re: Skull and Bones as the first
Post by: lmao on February 19, 2024, 22:58:46
not sure what is so special about this price, every nintendo switch exclusive is 59.99
Text only | Text with Images