My motivation to comment derives from recently reading multiple articles from various sites which all claim to report a "Major Discount" on a particular laptop through a specific site. Now just for accuracy and context in this case, is article, recently post by Mr. Redaktion on April 15, 2025, just two(2) days ago, it claims that the Asus Zenbook Duo 14 for 2025 has seen a major $250 discount on Amazon powered by the latest Core Ultra 9 258H CPU alongside the Intel Arc 140T iGPU. And as most digital article do, they reference a link for the store digital store in question so readers can go and see it for themselves. However, upon clicking the article in the site in question no such discount is being offered. Now obviously one can argue, "Hey, but the article is two days old and s*** happens." or "How can you hold the writer or the reporting website in question responsible for the price change?" And to those question I would just remind your right. No. I can not. But I would merely ask, Is the monetary compensation being offered worth the degradation of your editorial or writing integrity. I will reiterate my understanding of the linked digital store possibly not holding the reported price but that just validates mutually agreed upon nefarious affiliate marketing practices by not holding the digital store to its price post the launch of the article for at least a week. It's two days after the article was posted.