Quote from: dada_dave on February 13, 2025, 17:31:42

Quote from: Redaktion on February 13, 2025, 11:11:33

Intel is equipping the new Arrow Lake-H mobile processors with the Arc Graphics 140T and 130T, which are enhanced versions of the Intel Arc Graphics from the Meteor Lake generation. However, the 140T has little in common with the Arc Graphics 140V found in Lunar Lake chips.

Quote from: dada_dave on February 13, 2025, 17:27:32I think there may be a small typo:

QuoteAgainst Apple's M4 generation, the Arc Graphics 140T narrowly surpasses the standard M4 GPU (+7%) but falls significantly behind the smallest M4 Pro GPU, which is over 80% faster.

But the Steel Nomad Light chart (the M4 not on the other two) shows the Apple M4 ahead of the 140T by 7% (M4 3932 vs 140T 3692). If so, the above should read:

QuoteAgainst Apple's M4 generation, the Arc Graphics 140T is narrowly surpassed by the standard M4 GPU (+7%) and falls significantly behind the smallest M4 Pro GPU, which is over 80% faster.

I believe the typo may be a mistranslation. According to Google translate, the original German article got it the correct way around:

QuoteCompared to Apple's current M4 generation, the Arc Graphics 140T is narrowly beaten by the regular M4 GPU (+7%), but the smallest M4 Pro GPU is more than 80% faster.

Typo fixed!

Quote from: Redaktion on February 13, 2025, 11:11:33

Intel is equipping the new Arrow Lake-H mobile processors with the Arc Graphics 140T and 130T, which are enhanced versions of the Intel Arc Graphics from the Meteor Lake generation. However, the 140T has little in common with the Arc Graphics 140V found in Lunar Lake chips.

Quote from: dada_dave on February 13, 2025, 17:27:32I think there may be a small typo:

QuoteAgainst Apple's M4 generation, the Arc Graphics 140T narrowly surpasses the standard M4 GPU (+7%) but falls significantly behind the smallest M4 Pro GPU, which is over 80% faster.

But the Steel Nomad Light chart (the M4 not on the other two) shows the Apple M4 ahead of the 140T by 7% (M4 3932 vs 140T 3692). If so, the above should read:

QuoteAgainst Apple's M4 generation, the Arc Graphics 140T is narrowly surpassed by the standard M4 GPU (+7%) and falls significantly behind the smallest M4 Pro GPU, which is over 80% faster.

I believe the typo may be a mistranslation. According to Google translate, the original German article got it the correct way around:

QuoteCompared to Apple's current M4 generation, the Arc Graphics 140T is narrowly beaten by the regular M4 GPU (+7%), but the smallest M4 Pro GPU is more than 80% faster.

I think there may be a small typo:

QuoteAgainst Apple's M4 generation, the Arc Graphics 140T narrowly surpasses the standard M4 GPU (+7%) but falls significantly behind the smallest M4 Pro GPU, which is over 80% faster.

But the Steel Nomad Light chart (the M4 not on the other two) shows the Apple M4 ahead of the 140T by 7% (M4 3932 vs 140T 3692). If so, the above should read:

QuoteAgainst Apple's M4 generation, the Arc Graphics 140T is narrowly surpassed by the standard M4 GPU (+7%) and falls significantly behind the smallest M4 Pro GPU, which is over 80% faster.