As I can see in perfomance chart, MSI or Intel put its new Intel based console only a little bit higher than amd offers 140v vs 780m or Whole SOC perfomance. Only a few games is way ahead and all other all the same numbers That is very caution for ADs which tend to show absolute win for new product or SOC, so after all even if Intel new SOC faster in somehow it is not fast enough to defeat AMD old SOC, especially in very small console. I believe that NEW Intel graphic card might be fast and only compare with 780m and only on a not big margin and for sure not faster than 890m, Intel did not make a revolution but I am going admit Intel made AMD use reserve card in its sleeve 8700s which in whole different league than 140v.
$900 for a console just for gaming is unthinkable in Europe where it will reach a price of €1,000. This is not sold in Europe even if it has the best processor in the world. I don't trust the slides until I see independent reviews from both companies, both for products with Intel and AMD.
The Lunar Lake-powered MSI Claw 8 AI+, along with the Claw 7 AI+ bring impressive improvements to the table when compared to the previous-gen MSI Claw. Unsurprisingly, the Arc 140V iGPU allows the new Claw handhelds to pull ahead of the ROG Ally X by as much as 113%.