Having two different processors for two different OS is definitely the right move. This isn't the first time the Windows-Android hybrid existed. However, neither Microsoft nor Google wanted to share the CPU for two different OS back then. This time, Lenovo made the smart move by putting a standalone Snapdragon mobile SoC inside the screen for Android OS.

As much as I love this laptop, the OLED screen is not my favourite. I'd take an IPS LCD panel all day long. Also, I'd love to see the ability to directly boot the Windows partition to a secondary display without having the screen attached like Raspberry's Pi 400 and Pi 500.

Quote from: Based on November 10, 2024, 12:43:39

Quote from: Worgarthe on November 09, 2024, 19:02:57Extremely important. 240 Hz is an absolute bare minimum for working with spreadsheets and for general office work.

For an OLED panel it kinda is, as they often come with low frequency pwm which gives some people headaches. Usually higher Hz OLEDs generally come with higher frequency pwm.

If it were IPS, then yeah sure 60 Hz would be totally fine.

It's one of the reasons I have never been a fan of OLED screens, especially on laptops. Not all OLED screens have high PWM. You don't see such a problem with an IPS LCD panel. I'd be more than happy to trade the OLED screen for the IPS LCD screen, even at 60Hz.

Quote from: Worgarthe on November 09, 2024, 19:02:57Extremely important. 240 Hz is an absolute bare minimum for working with spreadsheets and for general office work.

For an OLED panel it kinda is, as they often come with low frequency pwm which gives some people headaches. Usually higher Hz OLEDs generally come with higher frequency pwm.

If it were IPS, then yeah sure 60 Hz would be totally fine.

QuoteOLED touchscreen limited to 60 Hz

Extremely important. 240 Hz is an absolute bare minimum for working with spreadsheets and for general office work.