News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by ARTcuda
 - October 11, 2024, 19:34:38
I'm bit desperate cause RAM size - ok, it's soldered but provide options for at least 64 GB. Why I need 64 GB in consumers model - probooks/elitebooks aren't available with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375/Ryzen AI 9 HX 365. Even Z books don't have options with newer CPUs, only older AMD or hot Intel in Fury with odd latency issues and weak GPU on top
Posted by Koten
 - October 10, 2024, 12:16:56
What about DPC Latencies?
Posted by Prime20
 - October 07, 2024, 19:12:26
9/26/2024:

The headline of the Article - "Arc Graphics 140V is faster and more efficient than Radeon 890M"

10/5/2024:

The headline of the article - "Radeon 890M faster than Arc 140V: HP OmniBook Ultra 14 review"


Posted by Poste
 - October 07, 2024, 00:40:36
Help me out here. Where does this new omnibook brand fit in? Is it a consumer line where it is above spectre brand (even though it lacks better display options) or is it a business brand fitting above the elite (but the build quality not on par or above elite and some business centric features missing) or is it a prisoner brand like the Lenovo thinkbook ( still missing options that the thinkbook 14 line offers).
So how can clients be swayed towards this line except for AI?
Posted by LL
 - October 06, 2024, 23:31:08
It is impressive how companies destroy their own advantages by not having coherence in their product.
IPS is not the problem, the problem is in a very mobile device they put a glossy screen  with only 300 nits brightness.
Posted by Alex1808
 - October 06, 2024, 22:36:25
Thank you for your review.
What I really don't get is why you're testing battery life under heavy load. This is isn't a gaming laptop, it's an "omni" use one, right? You're lacking a protocol for battery tests dedicated to mixed use...like Chrome with 10 tabs open, Word/Excel, Youtube or Netflix playing and an antivirus in the background.
Example: Can I take this laptop without the charger at the exhibition where I'll be for 10 hours? Or on my 1 day work trip? I dunno, nobody tested real-life use:))
Posted by Gobrel
 - October 06, 2024, 20:18:02
Would be great to include the Windows Version and driver version since there is a mess with performance under different windows versions.
Posted by Konstantinos
 - October 06, 2024, 15:53:58
You only need to apply liquid metal on the CPU & GPU and you will get even better performance and 15oC less temperature. And you have a great laptop.

I always do it on all my laptops/desktops.
Posted by DantePierttyr
 - October 06, 2024, 13:37:09
Quote from: toto1234 on October 06, 2024, 10:07:46
Quote from: chris@amd on October 06, 2024, 07:00:18Vivobook S14 lasts ~45% longer while having ~10% bigger battery and consumes more ! something is off here. actually way better power consumption figures than vivobook s14 hx370 which seems right considering IPS vs OLED with kind of similar res and refresh rate, but when it comes to battery life, its the other way. vivobook stays more than 16 hours browsing web while this 11 hours, while consuming less and every one knows OLED in white web pages eats battery.

You really shouldn't believe any battery life figures in review websites anyway.
In my experience (and I've had multiple Windows and Mac laptops reviewed on this site), you can basically divide the results by 2 to get something realistic.

I always get similar results to notebookcheck when it comes to battery life.
Posted by toto1234
 - October 06, 2024, 10:07:46
Quote from: chris@amd on October 06, 2024, 07:00:18Vivobook S14 lasts ~45% longer while having ~10% bigger battery and consumes more ! something is off here. actually way better power consumption figures than vivobook s14 hx370 which seems right considering IPS vs OLED with kind of similar res and refresh rate, but when it comes to battery life, its the other way. vivobook stays more than 16 hours browsing web while this 11 hours, while consuming less and every one knows OLED in white web pages eats battery.

You really shouldn't believe any battery life figures in review websites anyway.
In my experience (and I've had multiple Windows and Mac laptops reviewed on this site), you can basically divide the results by 2 to get something realistic.
Posted by Trindade
 - October 06, 2024, 08:14:57
You forgot to update the DPC Latency section, it still shows the placeholder guide
Posted by chris@amd
 - October 06, 2024, 07:00:18
Vivobook S14 lasts ~45% longer while having ~10% bigger battery and consumes more ! something is off here. actually way better power consumption figures than vivobook s14 hx370 which seems right considering IPS vs OLED with kind of similar res and refresh rate, but when it comes to battery life, its the other way. vivobook stays more than 16 hours browsing web while this 11 hours, while consuming less and every one knows OLED in white web pages eats battery.
otherwise nice machine. its plenty fast, cool and reasonably quiet. expected far more battery life and would prefer to see HDMI and more type-A ports and also type-c on both sides please. the price of HX365 would be considered good if it had 32GB ram. this HX375 is actually 1500 ish dollars that is not fair. some manufacturer should start putting LPCAMM2 on their laptops and not charge a heck of money for just 16GB. and just maybe somebody needs 64GB that which they don't offer.
Posted by AlexZ
 - October 06, 2024, 03:57:37
This is going to be a good alternative to Thinkpad P14s.
Posted by Redaktion
 - October 05, 2024, 23:46:49
For just over a grand, the OmniBook Ultra 14 offers massive performance gains when compared to other subnotebooks in its price range. Some cut corners have been made to the display, but they're nothing that most users can't live with.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Ryzen-AI-9-HX-375-performance-debut-HP-OmniBook-Ultra-14-laptop-review.893965.0.html