"The test encompassed a 24 FPS 1920 x 1080 local video playback with brightness set to 150 nits and WiFi turned off."
Whats with the unrealistic testing? 150 nits is quite low and no one turns off wifi when doing video playback.

Yeah, nice CGI, now can we test a real laptop

This needs to be verified by a non sponsored third party, preferably not by playing a video as this tests the video hardware encoder optimization and display. Not generic CPU utilization.

I would have liked to see the test performed on UHDp60 AV1 video being played from Youtube, at 250 nits brightness. And, as said in the article, M4 is coming soon. So the real test should be against that.

Quote from: JUAN_pcbox on September 18, 2024, 16:33:41For those who are gamers who play 4-5 hours a day, we are waiting for AMD 9000x3D, which everyone in my community is looking forward to having.

Yeah, everyone is looking forward to have a full-blown desktop CPU in a laptop.

Knowing Intel and its continuous lies in its slides, I would have liked to see that exhaustive comparison that does not indicate the true values ��to which the processor was subjected.
In any case, this LunarLake does not inspire confidence in me, I prefer to wait for PanterLake. For those who are gamers who play 4-5 hours a day, we are waiting for AMD 9000x3D, which everyone in my community is looking forward to having. It will be expensive, but we are already saving up. The problem will be that it will run out in milliseconds.