News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by werjj
 - September 09, 2024, 20:14:42
Quote from: Jean Claude on September 09, 2024, 20:10:25I got a Yoga 7 slim with the smallest X elite. Fantastic machine to work with, not much use to game but I don't so who cares...
Yep. Opinions of actual users are usually completely different from opinions of local "experts" running 2020 (at best) hardware.
Posted by Jean Claude
 - September 09, 2024, 20:10:25
I got a Yoga 7 slim with the smallest X elite. Fantastic machine to work with, not much use to game but I don't so who cares...
Posted by asdd
 - September 09, 2024, 07:33:26
Witcher seems like the worst test? It's not native for both ARM platforms?
Posted by Mr Majestyk
 - September 05, 2024, 02:58:24
Feel a bit sorry for Qualcomm, they will be forgotten immediately Lunar Lake launches and next year they are up against Mediatek and Nvidia tag-team. Between Strix and Lunar Lake they will have to slash prices even further.
Posted by mmc88
 - September 04, 2024, 15:08:46
Quoteonly fast performance cores are used for their processor cores because the efficiency cores of the more expensive models have been completely dispensed with

What efficiency cores? As far as I know the X Elite has 12 identical cores. There are no efficiency cores. Literally can't find anything about this elsewhere on the internet as well. Care to elaborate?
Posted by Redaktion
 - September 04, 2024, 14:39:29
Just over two months after the launch of the Snapdragon X Elite processors and the 10-core Snapdragon X Plus, Qualcomm has now released further ARM processors for laptops, including the Snapdragon X Plus 8-core variants with slower GPUs. We have tested the cheaper X1P-42-100.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-X-Plus-8-core-analysis-The-X1P-42-100-is-smaller-and-cheaper-but-not-very-efficient.883714.0.html