News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by MasoxCZ
 - June 30, 2024, 16:43:49
Don't even bother to consider Asustor. Their software is quirky And tech support Is absolutely incompetent.
Posted by Warmonk
 - June 22, 2024, 16:43:07
Totally agree about needing power consumption data here. DIY can be power efficient but could take a lot of hardware and Linux optimization. It could be a massive time sink for someone.
Posted by Pesh
 - June 22, 2024, 07:33:27
One thing to also add that would be nice is power consumption.  Pre build NAS is very power efficient. This is important if you want to pair it with an UPS. Forna next article i would love to see Software comparison between all. Feature wise etc :)
Posted by Kevin Galligan
 - June 22, 2024, 01:44:35
Quote from: MSchmidt on June 22, 2024, 00:13:29You didn't mention ECC at all, and if you are serious about data integrity, ECC is important.

Pre-built NASes often use ECC supporting CPU, MB and RAM (e.g. Synology).

But it is quite challenging to find such parts for custom build, especially at reasonable prices. Part of the issue is that manufacturers often don't specify if ECC is supported.

Until recently, the only Synology models with ECC were more in the "business" tier. I have a DS920+, and there's no ECC. I did just look up specs, and the DS923+ and DS723+ have ECC, but anything below that does not.

Of course, I do agree that ECC should be something to consider, and finding ECC-compatible hardware, never mind the memory itself, is a bit of a challenge, and generally bumps up the price. I have the DS920+, but decided to build some DIY servers because I caught the "self-hosting" bug. Overall, I got much more bang for buck, hardware-wise, but I'm not sure how true that would be if time were factored in. Overall, pretty happy the outcome though. Scratched some nerd itches.

However, on ECC, I think what you're storing does come into play. Most Unraid users I've interacted with are storing "media files", and not really backing up important data. In those situations, ehh. My latest box is running ubuntu with zfs for the data storage (4*12g drives in a ZRaid2, so pretty good setup), plus offsite backup. Ubuntu isn't exactly a "NAS", but I found TrueNAS to be overkill for general config and restrictive for apps/Docker at the same time. Yada yada. I need to cut back on my nerd builds.
Posted by MSchmidt
 - June 22, 2024, 00:13:29
You didn't mention ECC at all, and if you are serious about data integrity, ECC is important.

Pre-built NASes often use ECC supporting CPU, MB and RAM (e.g. Synology).

But it is quite challenging to find such parts for custom build, especially at reasonable prices. Part of the issue is that manufacturers often don't specify if ECC is supported.
Posted by Redaktion
 - June 21, 2024, 21:00:31
Whether it's QNAP, ASUStor, Synology or some other prebuilt brand, a NAS is not a cheap piece of equipment. With free or low cost operating systems such as TrueNAS, Open Media Vault or even Unraid is it cheaper to build your own with new or second hand parts, or buy off the shelf?

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Off-the-shelf-NAS-or-build-your-own-Is-it-really-better-to-buy-from-QNAP-Synology-or-another-big-brand.850739.0.html