Quote from: hugh mungus on May 09, 2024, 16:02:35

Quote from: TruthIsThere on May 08, 2024, 20:07:29It won't even be a thought for the panel in DC - appeal DENIED!

What planet is Bytedance is even from to think a panel of U.S. JUDGEs will go against the all 3 SUPREME legislation houses' law makers, BIPARTISAN (all parties) passed vote, that these 3 houses even author/creates the laws that these judges MUST ENFORCE?!?!

Privileged much, Bytedance? 😂 

Judges don't enforce laws, dingus.

Sure. "Enforce" is too strong of a word to use, if we were in a court of law, but guess what *genius* we are not, for my debate but **applying** **interpret** **follow** **ensure** **directing** the case to those that WILL ENFORCE after their ruling is all in the same boat at the end of the day to **represent** the laws that legislation  (aka the law(s) of CONGRESS / CONSTITUTION... are honored, genius. 😏

One more thing, **genius.** What does that has to do with a panel of APPOINTED JUDGES in DC (not elected by the people) has anything to do with this topic? Do you even have a seed of thought to contribute to this topic or... is your only goal is to troll and/or just sit in a minus corner... genius?! 🤔

Quote from: TruthIsThere on May 08, 2024, 20:07:29It won't even be a thought for the panel in DC - appeal DENIED!

What planet is Bytedance is even from to think a panel of U.S. JUDGEs will go against the all 3 SUPREME legislation houses' law makers, BIPARTISAN (all parties) passed vote, that these 3 houses even author/creates the laws that these judges MUST ENFORCE?!?!

Privileged much, Bytedance? 😂 

Judges don't enforce laws, dingus.

Quote from: NikoB on May 08, 2024, 21:51:22hen he looks at Themis's article

typo - should be read on the statue of Themis of course. She is wearing a blindfold and supposedly should be indifferent to anything other than the logic of the law. But we all know that there are no judges of this level in any country. And if such a person appears by chance (by some miracle), the system immediately rejects him/her and expels him/her.

What if there are still nonpartisan, independent and principled judges in the United States who value true freedom of speech? ;)

It certainly sounds like fantasy. Something like the Homeric laughter of any adult when he looks at Themis's article with his eyes closed...

It won't even be a thought for the panel in DC - appeal DENIED!

What planet is Bytedance is even from to think a panel of U.S. JUDGEs will go against the all 3 SUPREME legislation houses' law makers, BIPARTISAN (all parties) passed vote, that these 3 houses even author/creates the laws that these judges MUST ENFORCE?!?!

Privileged much, Bytedance? 😂 

Thus, the US authorities admit that their adult population is incompetent and inadequate. Hahaha. It cannot distinguish lies from truth. An adult, rationally thinking person, with the obligatory critical thinking, will independently figure out what is true and false, and no one has the right to tell him what and how to read and watch.

The totalitarian authorities of the USA ("democratic") violated the US Constitution. For which I congratulate all Americans. And also all sane people around the world, their remnants.

Freedom of speech has limits, such as if it can be argued that it's resulting in harm, which appears to be the case here. IANAL, but it seems to me every one of these arguments is very shaky and it seems highly unlikely they're going to win.

That's right, the Chinese! Beat the Americans with their own duplicity. What about freedom of speech? Hahaha!