Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by lmao

- March 06, 2024, 22:52:37

you can always create a battery routine that favors one or the other phone, that's how 100% of fake 'battery life' videos on youtube are made.

gsmarena has different opinion.
www.gsmarena.com/vivo_x100_pro-review-2645p3.php

android authority has different opinion.
www.androidauthority.com/vivo-x100-pro-review-3396425/

QuoteSpeaking of battery life, the X100 Pro's endurance was disappointing given the 5,400mAh battery. I was able to get just about eight hours of screen-on time with light usage (browsing Reddit, listening to podcasts), while heavier usage (e.g. plenty of camera usage, automatic photo/video backups to pCloud) resulted in just five and a half hours of screen-on time.

Posted by Mate

- March 06, 2024, 22:04:10

Honestly, not sure if Apple is winner there. iPhone 15 Max is almost as heavy as S24 Ultra and has smaller screen. Efficiency is what makes Apple not trail behind competition, not what makes them ahead of pack.

Posted by Redaktion

- March 06, 2024, 19:55:54

An interesting flagship phone battery comparison video has been posted pitting the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra, and the Vivo X100 Pro against each other. While the X100 Pro is the winner on the surface, it is actually the iPhone 15 Pro Max that offers the best efficiency.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/X100-Pro-vs-iPhone-15-Pro-Max-Vivo-tops-flagship-phone-battery-comparison-but-Apple-is-the-real-winner.810652.0.html