Quote from: indy on February 18, 2024, 20:08:22Interesting how people jump to biased conclusions about test results, without looking at differences in testing methodologies.
I agree. People will jump to conclusions, as they may not know all the ways a device can be tested or such.
However, there is very consistent data around the web showing that an Intel 155H running at its base TDP of 28 Watts generally gets a score of 13,000 on the last run of a Stress Test of Cinebench R23; not a 1 run Best Score. Therefore, a sustained score of 13,000; a 1 run test will obviously be higher than this.
The HP Spectre in this review at 24 watts (instead of 28 watts) is somehow only getting a score of 10,333 in Cinebench R23. It just doesn't add up. This has happened to other reviews too regarding these new Intel 155H chips in a variety of laptops; however, reviewer have stated that after Bios or Driver updates the performance of these devices had improved to more predictable / expected levels.
To be clear, I'm not blaming NotebookCheck for their Testing methods. I just strongly feel that something has to be off with the Bios or such that's affecting the score, which has plagued other reviewers too. It just seems to have happened more here at Notebookcheck as of late.
Personally, Notebookcheck is my go-to place for laptops reviews and tests. For me, they are the best. However, I also watch other reviews on YouTube of the same products, as I feel as a consumer it is best to get your information from more than just one source. For me, this is how you truly learn the ins and outs of something.