Quote from: Kingsman64 on March 04, 2024, 22:38:32Hi I am not a gamer, don't judge 😂 would this monitor be overkill for lightroom and Photoshop image editing I am using high megapixels and stacking macro and astro photos.
If it is overkill what should I be looking at please?
Price is not a problem I just want the best photo editing monitor.

it's a wrong place to ask this question, it's not a display review site, no one here understands how calibration works and only looks at average delta e, not realizing that average delta e = 2 when half colors is 0 and half colors is 4.

there are sites like tftcentral.co.uk, focused on proper display reviews. try your luck there.

Hi I am not a gamer, don't judge 😂 would this monitor be overkill for lightroom and Photoshop image editing I am using high megapixels and stacking macro and astro photos.

If it is overkill what should I be looking at please?

Price is not a problem I just want the best photo editing monitor.

24bit without 30bit color(HDR) - 29Gbps, HDR (4:4:4 - lossless color depth) - 36Gbps.

LG declared FreeSync Premium Pro - it's have 4:4:4 mode for HDR...

If there is a decent review with a real flow check, everything will immediately become clear. In principle, DP/HDMI operating mode analyzers are already on the market, even for the latest standards. It's strange that the editors haven't purchased them for reviews yet. It is enough to plug such a device into the port and check in what mode the monitor requests the signal.

Well, or check this programmatically with a specialized program, if you have a computer with a full version of the required port.

I saw a sign from several of the latest monitors with QD/W-OLED, where so far only Gigabyte has found a DP2.0+/UHBR20 input port for 4k@240Hz. The funny thing is that there is not a single video card and not a single port on a laptop that supports this monitor today, as far as I know. Where will buyers connect it?

nvm, i'm wrong

Quote from: NikoB on March 03, 2024, 15:45:32The 3440x1440 mode requires a minimum of 36Gbps.

@240Hz requires 24.62gbps

The 3440x1440 mode requires a minimum of 36Gbps. The DP1.4b port is only capable of transmitting 25.9Gbps.

HDMI 2.1 full version with FRL6 mode supports 240Hz, but given that LG installed fake DP1.4 in the monitor instead of the correct DP2.0/UHBR10, most likely the HDMI 2.1 ports are also fake and most likely there is no support even for FRL5 mode, which means that both inputs via DP and HDMI the signal is transmitted with loss of quality through DSC compression with losses.

What ? There are better offerings eith 4K QD OLED 240HZ using samsung panels. Dell and ASUS did better monitors. This award seems paid for.

Is this a joke? Where's the innovation? Another boring run-of-the-mill low res 34" curved screen.