Quote from: Mr Majestyk on February 01, 2024, 02:12:04What a joke. I'll bet DxO only tests crappy jpg's not RAW which is what you should use to get the most out of the expensive hardware. Also in all comparisons I've seen there's very little difference for stills at least and in double blind tests Google win easily.

lmao stop repeating "double blind" like monkey. If they ever wanted to show you a real test and not just Pixel money shots to get promoted on (Google's) Youtube, their comparison would consist of several hundreds photos, to give a proper statistical result.

And DXO is just serving the highest bidder, every photographer knows that.

Quote from: Mr Majestyk on February 01, 2024, 02:12:04What a joke. I'll bet DxO only tests crappy jpg's not RAW which is what you should use to get the most out of the expensive hardware. Also in all comparisons I've seen there's very little difference for stills at least and in double blind tests Google win easily.

That's because Google uses AI to artificially 'boost' images quality or what may be the AIs ideal version of 'perfect'. Have you ever taken a picture and immediately compare it to what you are actually seeing? Pixel and iPhone both are notorious for 'beautifying' their photos. And we (as humans) have become accosomed to processed images as the norm, you've forgotten what reality looks like. It's why double blind tests (for photos in general) are not really a good benchmark. What you see on your screen is not always going to be the same thing you see in real life. You can trick your eyes through a screen, but not when viewing nature.

What a joke. I'll bet DxO only tests crappy jpg's not RAW which is what you should use to get the most out of the expensive hardware. Also in all comparisons I've seen there's very little difference for stills at least and in double blind tests Google win easily.