Very stupid comparison...and certainly not on "everyday use". Completely unreliable review.

Next time, try to actually compare the same phones.

Don't listen to this clown. I own the S24+ Exynos and the phone runs perfectly fine, doesn't overheat and doesn't lag or stutter.

Adobe is never optimized for exynos so i'm surprised that it even runs 🤣 because exynos 2200 literally crash because of the ultra poor optimization from adobe

They fail to regard the notification on his phone that the Samsung s24+ is being set up. You can see it for a split frame when he pulls down the notification bar.

"Everyday use" Nice, professional journalism!

Cannot compare the + and Ultra, different machines, ex. Ultra having a better and bigger vapor chamber and cooling system.
Would be better to compare the S24+ with Snapdragon from US market to the S24+ with Exynos from international market.

When will notebookcheck review the S24 Ultra?

Typical anti Exynos rubbish! By another disingenuous Snapdragon geek

"Lagslike crazy"? Methinks another Snapdragon geek who doesnt know what he is talking about!

To me, that guy is always sketchy. He does either sponsored stuff or videos that are trying to get a raise out of viewers, this is clearly the second case. Can count on these kind of people to stop being dishonest for a single second unfortunately. I mean, he must know that if a process has not been optimized for that chip in who knows how long, it definitely will lag behind WHILE draining more power. So the end results are expected and meaningless, since its based on apps 99% of people won't use. Worse yet, if you're rendering videos on your smartphone, speed and efficiency are clearly not your concern

everyday use = rendering videos on cell phone? Serious?
Who does this and even more so using Adobe's rotten software?

The Adobe suite does not efficiently use even the hardware of the most powerful PCs like TR.