News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Jason_GR
 - February 10, 2024, 16:10:27
Very stupid comparison...and certainly not on "everyday use". Completely unreliable review.

Next time, try to actually compare the same phones.

Don't listen to this clown. I own the S24+ Exynos and the phone runs perfectly fine, doesn't overheat and doesn't lag or stutter.
Posted by Lolmerlin
 - January 29, 2024, 14:10:50
Adobe is never optimized for exynos so i'm surprised that it even runs 🤣 because exynos 2200 literally crash because of the ultra poor optimization from adobe
Posted by Jenai123
 - January 29, 2024, 13:43:51
They fail to regard the notification on his phone that the Samsung s24+ is being set up. You can see it for a split frame when he pulls down the notification bar.
Posted by Mr. Exynos
 - January 29, 2024, 13:25:39
"Everyday use" Nice, professional journalism!
Posted by Dantes Al.
 - January 29, 2024, 10:47:57
Cannot compare the + and Ultra, different machines, ex. Ultra having a better and bigger vapor chamber and cooling system.
Would be better to compare the S24+ with Snapdragon from US market to the S24+ with Exynos from international market.
Posted by Hari Alex
 - January 29, 2024, 10:44:21
When will notebookcheck review the S24 Ultra?
Posted by David Tough
 - January 29, 2024, 04:45:25
Typical anti Exynos rubbish! By another disingenuous Snapdragon geek
Posted by David Tough
 - January 29, 2024, 04:42:12
"Lagslike crazy"? Methinks another Snapdragon geek who doesnt know what he is talking about!
Posted by Alexandre
 - January 29, 2024, 00:08:02
To me, that guy is always sketchy. He does either sponsored stuff or videos that are trying to get a raise out of viewers, this is clearly the second case. Can count on these kind of people to stop being dishonest for a single second unfortunately. I mean, he must know that if a process has not been optimized for that chip in who knows how long, it definitely will lag behind WHILE draining more power. So the end results are expected and meaningless, since its based on apps 99% of people won't use. Worse yet, if you're rendering videos on your smartphone, speed and efficiency are clearly not your concern
Posted by LifePo7
 - January 28, 2024, 20:39:01
everyday use = rendering videos on cell phone? Serious?
Who does this and even more so using Adobe's rotten software?

The Adobe suite does not efficiently use even the hardware of the most powerful PCs like TR.
Posted by Redaktion
 - January 28, 2024, 14:14:30
It is just a relatively short sequence in the latest video by a Youtuber comparing the performance of an international Galaxy S24+ based on the Exynos 2400 with the Galaxy S24 Ultra and its onboard Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. While most benchmarks perform as expected, one render sequence and especially the things that happen afterwards cause the tester to frown. The "Plus model" also clearly looses in terms of battery life.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-Galaxy-S24-vs-Galaxy-S24-Ultra-Watch-the-Exynos-2400-lag-like-crazy-in-everyday-use.797923.0.html