Quote from: Kabelkanal on January 19, 2024, 18:21:08Can we agree that thinkpad keyboards should revert to a deeper key travel distance? For those who know the original / earlier Thinkpad keyboards... they are a joy with a travel distance of >= 1.8 mm ;-)I honestly don't care about travel distance, that one is easy to get used to as long as it stays on reasonable levels and not something bizarre like 0.4 mm or so. My first ThinkPad was T420s, I have a much newer X1 Carbon now and I had an opportunity to try the brand new Z13 G2 yesterday. Key travel is fine on them all... But what I miss a lot from those old(er) keyboards is 7 rows instead of 6 now. That is a way more significant difference than 0.3 mm key travel, IMHO. Well said everything in the first paragraph btw 👏
Quote from: Benjamin Herzig on January 15, 2024, 22:17:42I don't need a numpad and I don't want a numpad, it would impact my productivity in a negative way.But you are not a professional developer, engineer, or scientist. Even in business, the lack of a numpad is a critical flaw.
Quote from: Kabelkanal on January 15, 2024, 18:50:13The T14 G4 AMD is designed to be also productive on the road.With a keyboard without a full-fledged numpad, this is a priori impossible.
Quote from: LG on December 23, 2023, 23:04:36A lot of people including myself don't need 4K or 120Hz in a 13 or 14 inch office laptop. The blow on battery life is just not worth it. The most important things to me are decent brightness of at least 400 nits, rather 500 nits more, a proper anti-glare screen, 16:10 or even better 3:2 aspect ratio, and no PMW flickering. Contrast ratio should be high enough to provide good readability outside or next to windows and there should be little to no screen bleeding/IPS glow. I'd love the option to have 120Hz but also the ability to downscale to 60Hz (when saving on battery life is the priority) like on most Smartphones or an adaptive refresh rate. Anything between 2k to 3k is more than enough for most people on 13 or 14 inch laptops. For larger laptops it's a different story.
Quote from: NikoB on December 23, 2023, 21:32:56Again Lenovo is being redneck - instead of lpddr5 7500 it soldered the slow 6400.Ah, 6400 is now slow, lol. You forgot to add your favourite word there for its prefix though - shameful.
Quote from: NikoB on December 23, 2023, 21:32:56As for the ports, as usual, Lenovo is bad for the fact that there is no power supply through the usual, round corner plug - there is a place for it on the left edge. Then the laptop could be used much more comfortably by reclining right-handers. And so USB-c power supply, as usual. idiotically sticks out perpendicular to the case and it is quite easy to break it while lying with the laptop on the sofa or bed - especially for right-handed people.+
Quote from: NikoB on December 24, 2023, 12:06:02+Quote from: RobinLight on December 24, 2023, 03:31:31USB-C offers a lot of possibilities! You can extend your USB-C cable easily and use a compact corner connector so nothing sticksThere are no reliable adapters on the market. Or a power supply with an initially angled USB-C plug. Moreover, the USB-C connector itself is an order of magnitude less reliable than the round angled plug..
Quote from: NikoB on December 24, 2023, 12:06:02USB-c when operating from a power supply is extremely uncomfortable - it must be a backup plug and nothing more. The main one must be a round corner on the side or USB-C, but only in the back.One of many reliable solutions. Welcome to 2020, about 10 years ahead of you (and we are almost in 2024).
Quote from: NikoB on December 24, 2023, 12:06:02When running on battery power, no one bothers you to switch 4k to fhd mode at 60Hz, but from the power supply the picture must be ideal for the eyes. Only 300ppi+ produces high-quality text and graphics. You didn't guess this? The consumption of the matrix controller and video card will immediately drop significantly at fhd@60Hz, if the hardware designers are not idiots.You are a braindead moron. I will explain it again to you by simply copy/pasting my previous comment on that matter:
Quote from: Neenyah on December 16, 2023, 11:23:35Quite literally nothing is true nor accurate in that wall of text, pretty impressive. Especially not this part:Quote from: NikoB on December 15, 2023, 14:33:06When running on battery power, there is no problem switching to fhd mode on a 4k panel without losing any sharpness at the pixel level - 4 4k pixels turn into 1 fhd, and the interpixel distance is still less than on a native fhd panel.
At 720p four pixels are binned into one pixels down to perfect integer number with 2560x1440 so try to use 1280x720 on a 1440p panel. You certainly won't manage to go "without losing any sharpness at the pixel level" and everything will look like s***.
I mean if you are lazy to change your screen resolution to 50% lower one, just literally take a screenshot of your screen, paste it in Paint, resize it to be 50% smaller, then save that screenshot and open it on your native resolution screen and make it fullscreen. It looks like crap. It's pretty clear that you don't have a 4K screen, lol. That is obvious from your point of looking at everything through 100% scaling; good luck using 100% scaling with 4K at 16", haha. Most people use 200% and that is effectively FHD, just much sharper.
Also just switching to a lower-resolution mode most definitely won't help with battery life because the 4K panel is still taking higher amount of power (than a FHD panel) regardless of what data is sent to it. The power savings will not come from the display when you lower the resolution; the saving come from the GPU because it doesn't have to render as many pixels. Switching to lower refresh rate will help though.
But then again that is not the case anymore since about Intel HD 520 (which was working flawlessly with 4K) so I understand why you think it is as that GMA 950 in your 2008 MSI laptop is clearly struggling even with its own 768p native resolution; perhaps it is time for an upgrade, NikoB?
Quote from: RobinLight on December 24, 2023, 03:31:31I don't get your point. You have 8.5 to 12 hours of battery life so there is no need for the power supply when you sit on your couch... Or do you never get up from there 🙄? In the (lunch) pauses you could charge the device again.This is quite funny due to the fact that the performance of the processor and graphics on x86 drops significantly from the battery.
Quote from: RobinLight on December 24, 2023, 03:31:31USB-C offers a lot of possibilities! You can extend your USB-C cable easily and use a compact corner connector so nothing sticksThere are no reliable adapters on the market. Or a power supply with an initially angled USB-C plug. Moreover, the USB-C connector itself is an order of magnitude less reliable than the round angled plug.
Quote from: LG on December 23, 2023, 23:04:36A lot of people including myself don't need 4K or 120Hz in a 13 or 14 inch office laptop.Again, another nonsense from another ordinary person on NB. When was the last time you looked at your smartphone? Where is the text clearer? Why is it so much clearer on a smartphone? This is a homework assignment for you to understand why.
Quote from: NikoB on December 23, 2023, 21:32:56As for the ports, as usual, Lenovo is bad for the fact that there is no power supply through the usual, round corner plug - there is a place for it on the left edge. Then the laptop could be used much more comfortably by reclining right-handers. And so USB-c power supply, as usual. idiotically sticks out perpendicular to the case and it is quite easy to break it while lying with the laptop on the sofa or bed - especially for right-handed people.
Quote from: NikoB on December 23, 2023, 21:32:56I would never give an fhd screen with such characteristics more than 82-83 points. In addition, I do not believe in the contrast result of 1700:1+. And I have long proposed checking the contrast with a calibrator by steps of 50 nits up to 30 nit, plotting a graph of changes in contrast depending on brightness. Not everything is clean there from different manufacturers, as tests of different models of panels from different models have shown problems with contrast for low brightness (<50%).
If there was 4k@120Hz and really with a contrast of 1700:1, then the screen would deserve at least 90 points. And if the real response was less than 7ms on B2W/G2G and no glare, then 95+ points would be possible.