News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by ArsLoginName
 - December 05, 2023, 00:16:57
The real question is what is the power consumption to pull those scores for an H class chip. Maybe the laptops were on battery power and limited to 30-32 W. If so, then competitive to 7840U on Lenovo T14s and HP 845 G10 with 30 W -> 24 W and about 11,000 points according to Notebookcheck's test.

Then again, maybe Intel 4 is Intel 10 Round #1.
Posted by Yeshy
 - December 04, 2023, 14:18:34
I don't think max performance numbers matters for Intel, all that matters is idle/efficiency and iGPU performance

Intel is inconsiderable if you care about battery life or iGPU unless you're going to ~70W+
Posted by A
 - December 04, 2023, 13:46:59
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H was throttling obviously.

Overall the lineup looks like a performance downgrade by a year or two, maybe three if they will appear on sale in mid-2024.

That is if geekbench leaks are true.
Posted by Redaktion
 - December 04, 2023, 05:48:44
Intel's top-spec Meteor Lake processor has once again failed to perform as expected on Geekbench. It fails to keep up with its Core Ultra 7 equivalent and performs worse than its predecessor.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-Ultra-9-185H-Meteor-Lake-processor-loses-to-Core-Ultra-7-185H-on-Geekbench.778261.0.html