News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by RobertJasiek
 - November 16, 2023, 11:52:04
Quote from: A on November 16, 2023, 11:38:57Weather is not equal to climate.

Therefore, I have used whichever word applies correctly.

QuoteEither you question all those or you also stop questioning ice age by 2000 and ozone layer disappearance by 2020. Has to be a single standard of critical thinking or none at all. )

OT.
Posted by A
 - November 16, 2023, 11:38:57
Quote from: RobertJasiek on November 16, 2023, 10:25:42I have talked about my local weather, which amounts to at least a local climate change with effects on vegetation and animals in the garden.
Weather is not equal to climate.

Quote from: RobertJasiek on November 16, 2023, 10:25:42stop denying the climate change
Either you question all those or you also stop questioning ice age by 2000 and ozone layer disappearance by 2020. Has to be a single standard of critical thinking or none at all. )
Posted by RobertJasiek
 - November 16, 2023, 10:25:42
I have talked about my local weather, which amounts to at least a local climate change with effects on vegetation and animals in the garden.

As to the global development, stop denying the climate change! (However, this is the wrong forum for detailed discussion.)
Posted by A
 - November 16, 2023, 08:47:57
Quote from: RobertJasiek on November 16, 2023, 07:14:45It is false that it is false, but maybe where you live the weather has not changed on average. Here, in Berlin, Germany, it has.
Or someone told you it has changed. Our short lifespan doesn't let us fully comprehend if it really did change or it's just a long cycle. There's no clear consensus in scientific society, despite media will tell you otherwise of course.

Historically these theories never lasted long. In 60s it was "new ice age coming by 2000", in 80s "ozone layer going away by 2020" etc etc. Now we laugh reading those articles.

I always suggest watching George Carlin's "The planet is fine" just to calm down a bit. )
Posted by RobertJasiek
 - November 16, 2023, 07:14:45
Quote from: LL on November 15, 2023, 22:34:29
QuoteBecause the weather has changed significantly over the last 40 years (keyword: climate change)

False.

It is false that it is false, but maybe where you live the weather has not changed on average. Here, in Berlin, Germany, it has.
Posted by sya
 - November 16, 2023, 00:29:57
Ironically, the ECMWF predicted heavy rain with thunderstorms for today in my location, but nothing happened. Shortly after this, it changed to no rain. So, when we talk about accuracy, the ECMWF is not accurate to begin with.  It serves as a tool that aids human predictions. Unfortunately, all weather models fall short of achieving absolute accuracy, and that's wont happened even in the future. which is why meteorology exists to solve any errors and make better forecasts.

I've been in this field for about 7 years now, and I believe AI has been here for the past 7 years to solve all the complicated mathematical past data and provide insights for the path of hurricane events.

This seems more like a cheap marketing strategy to boost their value, as AI is a prevalent thing nowadays.
Posted by LL
 - November 15, 2023, 22:34:29
QuoteBecause the weather has changed significantly over the last 40 years (keyword: climate change)

False.
Posted by Redaktion
 - November 15, 2023, 21:52:36
Trained with 40 years of weather data, AI has found a shortcut in the calculation of weather forecasts. It produces prognosises with the same accuracy, but with a fraction of the effort.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/AI-weatherman-more-accurate-faster-more-opaque.768448.0.html