This is actually a good idea. The most efficient way to charge EVs is up to 80% and move onto the next charger. Of course that isn't always possible but when it is, one should always do it anyways and this encourages good practices
Quote from: Ross G on October 26, 2023, 19:45:42If Tesla starts charging a over 80% fee, that's going to cause a number of problems and outcries.
Why do I say that, not everybody sits at a supercharger and tries to charge the car to 100% because they want to. Sometimes they have to to be able to get to the next supercharger.
Last week I was at a V2 supercharger, four stalls, that was excessively busy. Problem for me is, in order for me to get to the next supercharger, the car wanted me to charge near 100% otherwise I would not be able to reach the next supercharger. There was no other superchargers in between and a detour would have left me in the same predicament.
Why should I be penalized if the car says I have to charge to near 100%
The answer to your question is simple, charging to 80% is quickest, by the time you reach the extra 20% another car could have gotten to 80% and another to 40%. So it goes without saying if one plans to stand there charging, one should be willing to pay for it. It isn't that much different than chargers that charge by the minute, only difference here is that the addition is only during congested times above 80%. That seems reasonable and encourages good charging behavior
But do note, with NACS becoming the US standard, you will now have more building NACS chargers. Even more so with IRA funding charger buildouts. Aka, the trip you speak of that required you to 100% may not be necessary anymore as closer chargers pop up.