News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by ambhaiji
 - September 15, 2023, 12:20:31
OP can you please post the scores of the A16 Bionic results you are using because from the ones on Geekbench itself the perf improvement is +16% and +12%
Posted by Lx
 - September 14, 2023, 23:28:05
Feels to me like there are multiple reasons.

  • Testing the 3nm architecture, hence not a lot of drastic changes in design.
  • manufacturing difficulties
  • not optimised for the architecture
  • typical Apple low year cycle
Posted by xanzaz2010
 - September 14, 2023, 19:27:21
How is 10% not an impressive gain? These chips are faster than my intel Macs now, and they have been for some time.
Posted by Ajay
 - September 14, 2023, 11:59:58
Main test would be if they increased the perf/watt compared to A16 and by how much.
Posted by Redaktion
 - September 14, 2023, 10:35:28
Apple's new A17 Pro SoC is only marginally faster than its predecessor in Geekbench 6.2. Its single-core performance improvement is around 10%, and multi-core about 5%.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-A17-Pro-disappoints-in-maiden-Geekbench-run-rumour-suggests-it-is-a-rebadged-A16-Bionic.750697.0.html