And this entire list can be written down at once as corrupt and corrupt corporate "scientists".

Microwave radiation is extremely dangerous. The maximum scientifically permissible level currently established in the USA is 1.6 kg/w.

Anyone who deliberately does anything higher is a criminal, including Apple management, and must serve long sentences in prisons in the US and other countries. It's amazing how two-faced the world is...

Taken from the WHO website:

"In the area of biological effects and medical applications of non-ionizing radiation approximately 25,000 articles have been published over the past 30 years. Despite the feeling of some people that more research needs to be done, scientific knowledge in this area is now more extensive than for most chemicals. Based on a recent in-depth review of the scientific literature, the WHO concluded that current evidence does not confirm the existence of any health consequences from exposure to low level electromagnetic fields."

The science is clear that EM radiation from consumer electronics is safe. It is a prevalent conspiracy theory/urban legend that common, low levels of EM radiation are harmful to the public.

Quote from: NikoB on September 15, 2023, 18:37:20There are no studies refuting the harm of microwave radiation, except for sales fakes from pseudo-scientific scammers. You really need to be punished for promoting dangerous radiation.

Just so we're clear, you're saying all of these studies are fake pseudo-science and you somehow are the lone sane voice of reason and logic in the world? Peer-reviewed studies published in professional established publications conducted by hundreds of scientists, doctors, and academics both in the United States and Europe.

They are all wrong? They're all in cohoots with Apple and nasty capitalism and don't forget I should be punished which you clearly mean legally and criminally for not agreeing with your position because that is "dangerous" and I'm spreading "misinformation".

GTFO!

They say it's easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled.  Are you so entrenched in your beliefs, that you can't possibly fathom you might be wrong and the EU like a lot of countries may suffer from overregulation forced upon them by their betters? I'm not saying having limits on EM radiation output on devices is a bad thing, but I don't know if the EM radiation from cell phones causes cancer based on my research.

"Inskip PD, Hoover RN, Devesa SS. Brain cancer incidence trends in relation to cellular telephone use in the United States. Neuro-Oncology 2010; 12(11):1147–1151. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Deltour I, Johansen C, Auvinen A, et al. Time trends in brain tumor incidence rates in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, 1974–2003. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2009; 101(24):1721–1724. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Karipidis K, Elwood M, Benke G, et al. Mobile phone use and incidence of brain tumour histological types, grading or anatomical location: A population-based ecological study. BMJ Open 2018; 8(12):e024489. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Withrow DR, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Lam CJ, Warren KE, Shiels MS. Trends in pediatric central nervous system tumor incidence in the United States, 1998–2013. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2019; 28(3):522–530. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Kshettry VR, Hsieh JK, Ostrom QT, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. Incidence of vestibular schwannomas in the United States. Journal of Neuro-oncology 2015; 124(2):223–228. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Lin DD, Lin JL, Deng XY, et al. Trends in intracranial meningioma incidence in the United States, 2004–2015. Cancer Medicine 2019; 8(14):6458–6467. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Deltour I, Auvinen A, Feychting M, et al. Mobile phone use and incidence of glioma in the Nordic countries 1979–2008: Consistency check. Epidemiology 2012; 23(2):301–307. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Little MP, Rajaraman P, Curtis RE, et al. Mobile phone use and glioma risk: Comparison of epidemiological study results with incidence trends in the United States. British Medical Journal 2012; 344:e1147. [PubMed Abstract]"

"SCENIHR. 2015. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks: Potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF): ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/docs/scenihr_o_041.pdfExit Disclaimer, accessed December 7, 2020."

"Röösli M, Lagorio S, Schoemaker MJ, Schüz J, Feychting M. Brain and salivary gland tumors and mobile phone use: Evaluating the evidence from various epidemiological study designs. Annual Review of Public Health 2019; 40:221–238. [PubMed Abstract]"

"International Agency for Research on Cancer. Non-ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic FieldsExit Disclaimer. Lyon, France: IARC; 2013. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, Volume 102."

"Cardis E, Richardson L, Deltour I, et al. The INTERPHONE study: Design, epidemiological methods, and description of the study population. European Journal of Epidemiology 2007; 22(9):647–664. [PubMed Abstract]"

"The INTERPHONE Study Group. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: Results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. International Journal of Epidemiology 2010; 39(3):675–694. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Grell K, Frederiksen K, Schüz J, et al. The intracranial distribution of gliomas in relation to exposure from mobile phones: Analyses from the INTERPHONE study. American Journal of Epidemiology 2016; 184(11):818–828 [PubMed Abstract]"

"Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Ahlbom A, et al. Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma: Results of the Interphone case-control study in five North European countries. British Journal of Cancer 2005; 93(7):842–848. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Larjavaara S, Schüz J, Swerdlow A, et al. Location of gliomas in relation to mobile telephone use: A case–case and case–specular analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology 2011; 174(1):2–11. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Cardis E, Armstrong BK, Bowman JD, et al. Risk of brain tumours in relation to estimated RF dose from mobile phones: Results from five Interphone countries. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2011; 68(9):631–640. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Johansen C, Boice J Jr, McLaughlin J, Olsen J. Cellular telephones and cancer: A nationwide cohort study in Denmark. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001; 93(3):203–207. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Schüz J, Jacobsen R, Olsen JH, et al. Cellular telephone use and cancer risk: Update of a nationwide Danish cohort. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006; 98(23):1707–1713. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Frei P, Poulsen AH, Johansen C, et al. Use of mobile phones and risk of brain tumours: Update of Danish cohort study. British Medical Journal 2011; 343:d6387. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Benson VS, Pirie K, Schüz J, et al. Mobile phone use and risk of brain neoplasms and other cancers: Prospective study. International Journal of Epidemiology 2013; 42(3): 792–802. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Benson VS, Pirie K, Schüz J, et al. Authors' response to: the case of acoustic neuroma: Comment on mobile phone use and risk of brain neoplasms and other cancers. International Journal of Epidemiology 2014; 43(1):275. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt186Exit Disclaimer"

"Muscat JE, Malkin MG, Thompson S, et al. Handheld cellular telephone use and risk of brain cancer. JAMA 2000; 284(23):3001–3007. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Inskip PD, Tarone RE, Hatch EE, et al. Cellular-telephone use and brain tumors. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 344(2):79–86. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Coureau G, Bouvier G, Lebailly P, et al. Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case–control study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2014; 71(7):514–522. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. Pooled analysis of case–control studies on malignant brain tumours and the use of mobile and cordless phones including living and deceased subjects. International Journal of Oncology 2011; 38(5):1465–1474. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Lönn S, Ahlbom A, Hall P, et al. Long-term mobile phone use and brain tumor risk. American Journal of Epidemiology 2005; 161(6):526–535. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Aydin D, Feychting M, Schüz J, et al. Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: A multicenter case–control study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2011; 103(16):1264–1276. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Castaño-Vinyals G, Sadetzki S, Vermeulen R, et al. Wireless phone use in childhood and adolescence and neuroepithelial brain tumours: Results from the international MOBI-Kids study. Environment International 2022; 160:107069. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Luo J, Deziel NC, Huang H, et al. Cell phone use and risk of thyroid cancer: A population-based case–control study in Connecticut. Annals of Epidemiology 2019; 29:39–45. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Volkow ND, Tomasi D, Wang GJ, et al. Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism. JAMA 2011; 305(8):808–813. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Kwon MS, Vorobyev V, Kännälä S, et al. GSM mobile phone radiation suppresses brain glucose metabolism. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 2011; 31(12):2293–301. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Kwon MS, Vorobyev V, Kännälä S, et al. No effects of short-term GSM mobile phone radiation on cerebral blood flow measured using positron emission tomography. Bioelectromagnetics 2012; 33(3):247–256. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Hirose H, Suhara T, Kaji N, et al. Mobile phone base station radiation does not affect neoplastic transformation in BALB/3T3 cells. Bioelectromagnetics 2008; 29(1):55–64. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Oberto G, Rolfo K, Yu P, et al. Carcinogenicity study of 217 Hz pulsed 900 MHz electromagnetic fields in Pim1 transgenic mice. Radiation Research 2007; 168(3):316–326. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Zook BC, Simmens SJ. The effects of pulsed 860 MHz radiofrequency radiation on the promotion of neurogenic tumors in rats. Radiation Research 2006; 165(5):608–615. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Lin JC. Cancer occurrences in laboratory rats from exposure to RF and microwave radiationExit Disclaimer. IEEE J of electromagnetics, RF, and microwaves in medicine and biology 2017; 1(1):2–13."

"Gong Y, Capstick M, Kuehn S, et al. Life-time dosimetric assessment for mice and rats exposed in reverberation chambers of the 2-year NTP cancer bioassay study on cell phone radiation. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility 2017; 59(6):1798–1808. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Capstick M, Kuster N, Kuehn S, et al. A radio frequency radiation exposure system for rodents based on reverberation chambers. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility 2017; 59(4):1041–1052. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Falcioni L, Bua L, Tibaldi E, et al. Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission. Environmental Research 2018; 165:496–503. [PubMed Abstract]"

"International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). ICNIRP note: Critical evaluation of two radiofrequency electromagnetic field animal carcinogenicity studies published in 2018. Health Physics 2020; 118(5):525–532. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Ahlbom A, Green A, Kheifets L, et al. Epidemiology of health effects of radiofrequency exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives 2004; 112(17):1741–1754. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Sagar S, Dongus S, Schoeni A, et al. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: A systematic literature review. Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology 2018; 28(2):147–160. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Eeftens M, Struchen B, Birks LE, et al. Personal exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields in Europe: Is there a generation gap? Environment International 2018; 121(Pt 1):216–226. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Atchley P, Strayer DL. Small screen use and driving safety. Pediatrics 2017; 140(Suppl 2):S107–S111. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Llerena LE, Aronow KV, Macleod J, et al. An evidence-based review: Distracted driver. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2015; 78(1):147–152. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Brzozek C, Benke KK, Zeleke BM, Abramson MJ, Benke G. Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation and memory performance: Sources of uncertainty in epidemiological cohort studies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2018;15(4). pii: E592. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Zhang J, Sumich A, Wang GY. Acute effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field emitted by mobile phone on brain function. Bioelectromagnetics 2017; 38(5):329–338. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Foerster M, Thielens A, Joseph W, Eeftens M, Röösli M. A prospective cohort study of adolescents' memory performance and individual brain dose of microwave radiation from wireless communication. Environmental Health Perspectives 2018; 126(7):077007. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Guxens M, Vermeulen R, Steenkamer I, et al. Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, screen time, and emotional and behavioural problems in 5-year-old children. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 2019; 222(2):188–194. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Schüz J, Elliott P, Auvinen A, et al. An international prospective cohort study of mobile phone users and health (Cosmos): Design considerations and enrolment. Cancer Epidemiology 2011; 35(1):37–43. [PubMed Abstract]"

"Toledano MB, Auvinen A, Tettamanti G, et al. An international prospective cohort study of mobile phone users and health (COSMOS): Factors affecting validity of self-reported mobile phone use. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 2018; b221(1):1–8. [PubMed Abstract]"

"U.S. Federal Communications Commission. (n.d.). FCC Encyclopedia: Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for Cellular Telephones. Retrieved December 7, 2020."

"U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2009). Radiation-Emitting Products: Reducing Exposure: Hands-free Kits and Other Accessories. Silver Spring, MD. Retrieved December 7, 2020."

"Kühn S, Cabot E, Christ A, Capstick M, Kuster N. Assessment of the radio-frequency electromagnetic fields induced in the human body from mobile phones used with hands-free kits. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2009; 54(18):5493–508. [PubMed Abstract]"

Quote from: NikoB on September 15, 2023, 18:37:20There are no studies refuting the harm of microwave radiation, except for sales fakes from pseudo-scientific scammers. You really need to be punished for promoting dangerous radiation.

Niko can you make guide about IPS-OLED

There are no studies refuting the harm of microwave radiation, except for sales fakes from pseudo-scientific scammers. You really need to be punished for promoting dangerous radiation.

Quote from: NikoB on September 15, 2023, 11:38:03The government of the United States and other countries continues to allow the sale of cigarettes and Teflon, even though the harm has been scientifically proven.

The US government, like other countries, consists of officials who care about their well-being primarily through bribes from corporations, and not about the health of the nation. In addition, most of them are the most stupid people, because... those who could not get a good job in the private sector due to lack of intelligence go to the government, i.e. lost the competition.

You have to be an idiot to believe that microwave radiation does not cause harm, which was scientifically proven a long time ago. Especially at a considerable distance from base stations, when power reaches peak levels.

The permitted level in the USA is 1.6 W/kg, while Apple regularly violates this value from series to series. The same scandal happened previously with episode 11 and beyond. Everyone knows that Apple phones have always been the most dangerous in terms of radiation.

Those who deny harm or call to ignore it are scoundrels and should be subject to criminal prosecution.

Hate to break it to you, but 55 US and European studies say you are wrong about non-ionizing radiation FROM cell phones cause cancer. And they are linked as the justification for the official US government position. You should give it a read instead posting a wall of nonsense text. Remember science is your friend. Trust the science!!

Quote from: NikoB on September 14, 2023, 12:16:07

Quote from: Anonymous512 on September 14, 2023, 03:47:12There is no evidence that non-ionizing radiation like the radiation emitted by phones causes cancer.

You're lying, there are plenty of studies like this. And the standards are set for a reason. Everyone who writes something like this demands legal criminal prosecution for intentionally misleading consumers.

Hello, I would like to know about IPS. Is a 2-2.5K screen with IPS good enough, or is it necessary to have 4K? You often criticize OLED screens. There is an Acer Extraordinary Go 14-16 laptop that has OLED with 90-120Hz. Do you have an opinion on this?  store. acer .com /en-us/swift-go-16-laptop-sfg16-71-7902

The government of the United States and other countries continues to allow the sale of cigarettes and Teflon, even though the harm has been scientifically proven.

The US government, like other countries, consists of officials who care about their well-being primarily through bribes from corporations, and not about the health of the nation. In addition, most of them are the most stupid people, because... those who could not get a good job in the private sector due to lack of intelligence go to the government, i.e. lost the competition.

You have to be an idiot to believe that microwave radiation does not cause harm, which was scientifically proven a long time ago. Especially at a considerable distance from base stations, when power reaches peak levels.

The permitted level in the USA is 1.6 W/kg, while Apple regularly violates this value from series to series. The same scandal happened previously with episode 11 and beyond. Everyone knows that Apple phones have always been the most dangerous in terms of radiation.

Those who deny harm or call to ignore it are scoundrels and should be subject to criminal prosecution.

Oh and that link I posted cites 55 peer-reviewed published US/EU research studies and is the official position by the United States Government regarding cell phones and cancer risk factors.

Quote from: NikoB on September 14, 2023, 12:16:07

Quote from: Anonymous512 on September 14, 2023, 03:47:12There is no evidence that non-ionizing radiation like the radiation emitted by phones causes cancer.

You're lying, there are plenty of studies like this. And the standards are set for a reason. Everyone who writes something like this demands legal criminal prosecution for intentionally misleading consumers.

Stop spreading misinformation. The other poster is correct. Now I'll sit back and wait for wall of text you typically write telling everyone why this government site is wrong and you are somehow always correct.

France and EU countries are notorious for over-regulation anywhere and everywhere they get a chance. Not tha the USA is any better, but the link below from an official govt website completely contradicts the notion that non-ionizing radiation emitted from cell phones causes any cancer and they cite numerous research studies to back up their claim.



"www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/cell-phones-fact-sheet"

Quote from: Anonymous512 on September 14, 2023, 03:47:12There is no evidence that non-ionizing radiation like the radiation emitted by phones causes cancer.

You're lying, there are plenty of studies like this. And the standards are set for a reason. Everyone who writes something like this demands legal criminal prosecution for intentionally misleading consumers.

There is no evidence that non-ionizing radiation like the radiation emitted by phones causes cancer. But hey, let's attack competition in the market anyway!

Next Up on France's Ban List: Ripe oranges. They emit too much juice when squeezed. No way that can be healthy.

So they did officially issue a no-sell order. Last I heard was they were only contemplating. Well, good for them. Makes me wonder about all the other phones on the market, but I assume this agency is/has tested them as well?

I would be those 5G antennas have something to do with this....

Quote from: NikoB on September 13, 2023, 21:09:45And what also makes me laugh (including Hollywood films) is the new theme among the stupid young people of the planet - talking while holding the phone perpendicular to the head and the microphone to the lips - they think that in this way they reduce radiation near the head, but everything is exactly the opposite.

I see this all the time and it drives me up the wall for some reason. Where have you heard the reasoning for this? I've always thought it's about sounding louder to the receiving end or something. I doubt youngsters worry about phones emitting radiation.