So the verdict is..... "No verdict".  Way to stay PC and not hurt anyone's feelings.

Good Article. Surprised Sony's Xperia 1 IV wasn't included.

Any particular reason?

Quote from: Noel on March 10, 2023, 11:49:13Why wasn't the Huawei mate 50 pro included in the test

Huawei does not have access to TSMC factories, there are no smartphones with this brand on the market with modern technical processes. Does not mislead the public. This is a completely different Honor company. Nothing to do with Huawei.

S23 takes fake photos in low light, which is already a proven fact.

"The photos don't represent the resolution of each camera, instead, they are processed to 12 MP or 50 MP photos"

Why would you not test each phone/camera set to max resolution? i.e. 48,50,200mp?


Isn't this like testing 2 computers, but limiting the faster one to the speed of the slower one to "compete" with it?

I will agree, the iPhone front facing camera is leading the pack. But beyond that, I feel like each phone excels in a specific area.

You say the S23 Ultra "Can't quite keep up with the rest of the phones". Yet, I see it winning most tests with other new phones. interesting..

wondering why not taking about dumb phones or kosher phones?

Why do you write that "The Pixel 7 Pro's has a great zoom of up to 5x?  Of these camera's, only the Pixel has near optical zoom quality up to 10x.  In this 5-10x zoom range, the Pixel is by far the best, but it seems you hardly tested that?

Why wasn't the Huawei mate 50 pro included in the test

Excellent.