Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by heffeque

- March 16, 2023, 00:17:33

Quote from: Anonymousgg on March 15, 2023, 19:29:14At this point, the memory speed needs to be known or the result is worthless. It should top out at around LPDDR5X-7500.

Stlll, there should be a modest gain over Rembrandt, and RDNA 3+ in Strix Point should be amazing even if it's another incremental gain.

Agreed.
DDR5-4800 is surely not going to perform as well as LPDDR5X-7500, especially on GPU tasks.

Posted by Anonymousgg

- March 15, 2023, 19:29:14

At this point, the memory speed needs to be known or the result is worthless. It should top out at around LPDDR5X-7500.

Stlll, there should be a modest gain over Rembrandt, and RDNA 3+ in Strix Point should be amazing even if it's another incremental gain.

Posted by Redaktion

- March 15, 2023, 18:57:30

This Geekbench test was performed on a 2.7 GHz Radeon 780M integrated with the Ryzen 7 7840HS APU, but there also is a 2.8 GHz version on the Ryzen 9 7940H that could come close to an Nvidia GTX 1650 Ti laptop dGPU.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-s-Radeon-780M-iGPU-beats-the-Nvidia-GTX-1650-Max-Q-laptop-dGPU-in-new-Geekbench-test.701261.0.html