QuoteOur 13th gen Core i9-13950HX is about 30 percent faster than the previous generation champion the Core i9-12900HX.
In fact, this is not so, according to the tests on NB, in this review, see: notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-Legion-7-16IAX7-laptop-review-Fast-16-inch-gamer-with-165-Hz-display.652845.0.html
12900HX reaches 3270-3280 points in the long run, only with PL1 = 136W, and in the MSI Titan there are about the same with PL1 = 125W.
But 13950hx is the same declaration in the review, has PL1 only 109W.
Thus, if their results are related to 1W consumption, it turns out that L7 consumes 25% more energy for ~ 3200 in CBR15, than 13950HX in Razer and MSI Titan C I9 generation consumes 14.6% more than the I9 of the 13th generation .
The total difference, taking into account the difference in consumption not 30%, but more than 71% in the case of L7 and 57% in the case of MSI Titan 2022. But you were mistaken even here, because There it turns out not 30%, but more than 37%+ with top -end solutions of 2022 from Lenovo and MSI.
Go ahead...
QuoteWhen running 3DMark 06 on Balanced mode, for example, fan noise would steadily increase to 39 dB(A) much earlier in the benchmark compared to just 31 dB(A) on the Lenovo Legion S7 16.
But in this review (notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-Legion-7-16IAX7-laptop-review-Fast-16-inch-gamer-with-165-Hz-display.652845.0.html) there is not a word about the noise in 31dB in L7 Slim 2022...
Moreover, comparing L7 Slim on the old i9 and the new Razer, it is clearly visible, according to your noise table, that Razer is much quieter in a low and medium load. Which completely contradicts your conclusions.
Next:
You tell readers that in 4K resolution 4080 issues In GTA V (2015) 143.7FPS, but at the same time indicate that in QHD the same card issues 125.2FPS. This is impossible physically, because 4K more costly resources permission, which is confirmed by tests in other games.
PS,
According to your data in AIDA64, the memory throughput (read, write, copy) averages about 80GByte/s, which is about 5 times slower than Apple's M2 Max specs, but unfortunately I have not seen anywhere to confirm this data for memory controller from Apple in practice in some well-known cross-platform memory tests...
If Apple memory controller with 512 bit bus really has more than 4x faster memory, that's a complete smash of the all x86 camp...