Quote from: Räuber Hotz on February 07, 2023, 09:14:06Given that the Radeon 680m/780m is 30-50% faster then Intel Iris, a 100% performance improvement for the Intel Iris would utterly destroy the Radeon 680m/780m. Checkmate AMD. It's over. Intel wins again.

Except that the 7940HS has been out for a few months (albeit in a limited number of laptops in mini PCS), whereas Meteor Lake won't be available for a few more months.

QuoteAdditionally, OneRaichu suggests that the Meteor Lake's iGPU with 128 Execution Units (EU) may end up being twice as fast as the 96 EU Iris Xe iGPU.

Given that the Radeon 680m/780m is 30-50% faster then Intel Iris, a 100% performance improvement for the Intel Iris would utterly destroy the Radeon 680m/780m. Checkmate AMD. It's over. Intel wins again.

Good to see, that tiles are going mainstream. Now it needs one more tile for 4GB HBM memory. Like they had on that rare 8th gen CPU for NUC-s.

Dude writes for a pc tech outlet.

Look at that.

It "might" work but we "just can't know"

Yes, yes you can.

Its due to the drop on node size.

Ive been saying this for years that Intel is 2 nodes behind and the only reason dumb entites like Apple talk about PPW is because they are architecturally behind by years, they just used a smaller node process 5 vs 10 in most cases.

The die shrink on 14th gen from the new node process will ENSURE the increased PPW over 13th gen.

Its not a "maybe, we'll see" or "that's what Intel says"

Its a fundamental function of the physical properties.

It doesn't matter who shrinks die, any CPU on a smaller node process is more efficient on ppw.

Ya'll should learn these basics before writing articles.

No Fawad,  it's not less than 50 % of the energy, it's actually less thank 66 % of the energy. You should brush up on your math.
And by the way, is there anybody still believing this Intel crap? I'll believe it when I see it.