Quote from: GehtDichNixAn on January 08, 2023, 13:53:29Ja was für ne tolle Workstation mit 60Hz und 16:9 Sehschlitz. Für 2800€ (!) hole ich mir ohne weiter nachzudenken lieber ein 16" Macbook Pro, welches in nahezu allen Belangen (außer Gaming und Aufrüstung) gnadenlose überlegen ist.

The Mac book is far from suitable for everyone, especially it is not widely quoted in business tasks, because. it is simply not compatible with anything with its OS. Moreover, a defective keyboard without a numpad is far from suitable for everyone. And also the macbook is now not fully x86 compatible, which also imposes a lot of real restrictions. Thirdly, the resolution on the MacBook is lower, which means the text is not so clear. And not only that, all MacBooks have glossy screens, so all the glare will be yours...

I agree that the price is too high, but the Macbook of this model is definitely not a competitor due to different market niches and target groups of buyers.

It's just that HP marketers and engineers have been doing some kind of garbage for a year now, instead of making a normal modern laptop on the latest hardware.

Ja was für ne tolle Workstation mit 60Hz und 16:9 Sehschlitz. Für 2800€ (!) hole ich mir ohne weiter nachzudenken lieber ein 16" Macbook Pro, welches in nahezu allen Belangen (außer Gaming und Aufrüstung) gnadenlose überlegen ist.

It would be a good laptop, with a normal keyboard without a stupid power button next to the backspace. HP's marketers and miners have completely gone to the roof, saving on matches. The separate power button was spared. Shame at this price...

Well, the cooling is too noisy with such a limitation on the speed of the processor.

The screen there should be (simply obliged) 4k@120Hz. As well as the presence of an RGB keyboard with controls on each button. For such a price!

And I don't believe in a contrast higher than 1500:1 on a semi-matte screen, unless there is a panel from Lg "IPS Black". This is physically impossible, without damaging the gamma curve from the factory and making it impossible to see dark shades. And in the reviews on NB, the gamma curve is not shown. And it is also very bad that the contrast is not measured by 15% -25% -50% -75% -100%, as other reviewers do - this is where extremely unpleasant details of the specific implementation of laptop and monitor screens become clear ...

In general, HP is going down in all directions. They don't understand what people really need.

Wow! Bei 150 nits 9:59 und bei maximal 388 nits (259%) 9:02 (90,5%) Akkulaufzeit dank Low-Power-Display! Einfach nur wow! Sollte jedes Mobilgerät haben!