Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Bikar

- November 30, 2022, 13:10:15

The maths is wrong

The 3080 being 33% slower, means the 4080 is 49% faster.

67 to 100 is a 49% increase. Not 33%

Posted by Mr Majestyk

- November 30, 2022, 01:47:51

This is the very definition of technological stagnation. Adding 50% more performance for 50% more price is NOT progress in any way shape or form. A truly pathetic effort from the money grubbing Huang. Needs a $400 price cut to be worthy of being called a 4080.

Posted by games

- November 29, 2022, 11:34:16

Why do you need 4080 really? Nvidia should support more games with wider genre range before selling this cards anymore. Will you play pixelated indies with your 4080?

Posted by good_job

- November 28, 2022, 18:46:33

Good job for points it out - Im saying it for a while... (that the 4080 is worse compare to 3080 in pref/price)

Posted by Redaktion

- November 28, 2022, 10:29:01

The RTX 4080 is one-half of the Lovelace duo that Nvidia unveiled on September 20. The GPU comes with 9,728 CUDA cores, 16 GB of VRAM with a base clock of 2.21 GHz and a boost clock of 2.51 GHz. 3DCenter has now compiled launch review results of the GPU to provide a holistic view of the performance and price value offered by the board.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/RTX-4080-review-roundup-suggests-33-faster-4K-performance-39-better-perf-W-and-31-worse-perf-price-for-the-GPU-vs-RTX-3080.669765.0.html