Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by jax

- November 24, 2022, 21:41:14

Quote from: Ian on November 24, 2022, 20:08:14This is only the cell density and not the pack density which is more important than the cell density

The problem is that no Teslafans want to talk about the entire pack, since cells are non-replaceable in the 4680 variant which make them a nightmare in the long run... ;)

Posted by Ian

- November 24, 2022, 20:08:14

This is only the cell density and not the pack density which is more important than the cell density

Posted by RoganJ

- November 21, 2022, 14:49:52

A new Elons lie, when he announced the batteries, the graphs showed 50% more capacity. And even then smart people said that he was probably lying...

Posted by K

- November 19, 2022, 12:49:21

Maybe it's the lack of cobalt.

Posted by Hedwig the bird

- November 19, 2022, 10:57:53

So they use cheaper batteries now. Who cares? Tesla is the most popular electric car brand because the CIA needs Musk as a living proof that the US remains the best country for inventors and entreprenueurs - NOT because it's a great company producing great cars.

Posted by Redaktion

- November 18, 2022, 13:33:23

Those Model Y buyers who queue for an Austin-made unit with the 'revolutionary' 4680 battery cell may be in for a disappointment. A teardown and analysis of one such cell returned lower energy density than that of the Model Y with 2170 battery. Still, Tesla benefits from the lower per-pack price.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Tesla-4680-vs-2170-battery-cell-test-reveals-lower-energy-density-in-the-Texas-made-Model-Y.669162.0.html