Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Rob M

- October 19, 2022, 00:28:20

I hardly care about a 10% increase in performance but I really cared about was a second smaller screen on the back so when it's face down I could still get information get information again Samsung failed

Posted by Longan

- October 17, 2022, 23:21:29

It will match the A16, the test was only done while the cores were clocked below the maximum clock speed. I estimate the score of the end product to be around 1700 for single core and around 5000 for multi core. This is coming from an Apple user.

Posted by Mr. Anonymous

- October 17, 2022, 16:55:31

I think it should be compared to SD8gen1, because that is what the predecessor S22 has. It's no apple A16, but still looks like a pretty good improvement.
Hope that S23 will at least match the battery performance of Iphone 13.

Posted by Adam222222

- October 17, 2022, 14:03:48

Will this CPU be available globally or only outside Europe?

Posted by Redaktion

- October 17, 2022, 11:39:43

The Galaxy S23 series appears to have made its first trip over to Geekbench, revealing early performance numbers and details of what could be Qualcomm's next-gen flagship chipset, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-Samsung-Galaxy-S23-Geekbench-listing-outs-Snapdragon-8-Gen-2-core-details.662356.0.html