QuoteHochwertiges 165-Hz-Display mit 100 % sRGB und schnellen Reaktionszeiten
This is a screen with a shameful contrast below 1000:1 and a shameful response at the level of 60-75Hz of the screen - an excellent screen? Author, you definitely didn't make a mistake with the data that you posted for public viewing, which readers see?
Again, disgusting ram tuning - soldered lpddr5 6400 on board (and not 3200, as the author falsely claims), but the memory throughput is shameful, slightly better than DDR4 3200. Despite the fact that Intel versions with a slower DDR5 4800 have throughput from 65Gb/s...
AMD is clearly no longer a cake, well, except perhaps for autonomy, but who needs it in such laptops that work 99% of the time from the outlet?