Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51Most of requirements to an "ideal" laptop that you listed do not describe a typical "cash cow".That's right, capitalism at the stage of the wildest imperialism has turned into a brake on civilizational progress and maximum damage to the planet's ecology, for the sake of a bunch of nouveaux riches. I am very far from the leftist ideas of taking everything away and dividing it, but everything should be optimal, taking into account the interests of the fastest positive development of civilization (in terms of the ability of individuals to obtain high-quality and long-lasting devices with a minimally fair margin) and minimal impact on the environment. The current disgusting consumerism, deliberately preached by bastard marketers on the instructions of their owners, takes the topic as far as possible away from the optimal product and minimal environmental damage.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51Laptops are portable PCs. Higher resolution means higher energy consumption. Potential buyers from the main focus group don't need it as it would sip too much energy.You're lying. Because 90% of users use laptops (especially with discrete chips) from the outlet without caring about autonomy. Because they simply replace them at home and at work with desktops in the form of a mobile workplace - from outlet to outlet. The consumption of a 4K panel is ridiculous, and the price is only $30 higher than a 2.5K panel.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51Besides, many people purchased a separate monitor for a home use during the COVID pandemic. Why would one still ask for a built-in 4K marketing BS nowadays? Content creators? Are they in the main focus group?This is nonsense, because in the case of connecting a laptop to an external monitor, the whole point of a laptop is lost - a quick mobile change of place at home and carry out on another place. A good 4k panel (it easy switch to 1080p/60Hz for battery mode) with a B2W/G2G response of less than 10ms should be in every universal work laptop, and even more so in a gaming laptop.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51Forget it, soldered 16 gigs of RAM are everywhere, there are considered as a part of a "standard" config.Another nonsense. The mainstream DDR4 3200 now costs $80-90 for 32Gb, which is just a penny considering the general price of laptops from the category of universal-working ones, i.e. mainstream models. DDR5 costs +50-60% more today, but few people need it yet (and the speed increase does not match its price, i.e. it will quickly fall in price). Do not solder at least 32GB+ or do not have 2 slots - cynical and redneck manufacturers and nothing more. The greed of manufacturers in this matter is phenomenal.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51This means extra $$$ for the second M.2 connector, higher PCB design complexity and so on.The wiring of a large wholesale batch of motherboards for 2 connectors - within the cost of one motherboard - costs a penny. These are purely marketing perversions.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51TB stuff is owned by Intel, the licence costs money.Nonsense. A license per laptop costs a few cents. At times more expensive is the power hardware for TB4/USB40 logic in SoCs on mainboards, but again - against the backdrop of the overall price of a laptop, this all costs a penny (external TB3/4 controller with power circuits for this on mainboard is retail cost ~+$35-40 for laptop from 2018!). Again, deliberate marketing restrictions-perversions. Let me remind you that the TB controller is now built into both Intel and AMD SoCs, i.e. the laptop buyer obviously overpays for the SoC logic for TB controllers, which the bastard laptop manufacturers do not allow it to use for many lmodels. Even funny Pentium Gold 7505 have TB4.0 logic! Therefore, the price of a TB4.0/USB40 port output is not higher than $15-20 per laptop. This is again nonsense against the background of the general price of most mainstream laptops, especially "gaming" models. In this case, lower the price of processors minus this logic. Make a release processors with cheaper versions without TB4/USB40. Ok? Where are they don't do it? We are being deliberately peddled with solutions that are suboptimal in price. This is vile and is a fraud in practice, thanks to the illiteracy of most of the world's population in understanding what they are being sold and how much it really costs from factory. Intel and AMD deliberately stuff SoCs with a bunch of unnecessary logic to justify the inflated price of their processors. But laptop manufacturers do not output this logic (for which we are forced to pay Intel and AMD anyway, because we cannot refuse it and buy options without it) on external ports. This is complete bestiality in reality. And a lot of people don't understand this. That's the problem. Because they are technically illiterate, and many in the Western world have too much easy money (credit at the state level) to ignore the obviously inflated price. At the same time, in third world countries, prices are even higher than in the US with lower incomes!
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51HDMI 2.1 may require at least a dGPUYou again betray your complete technical illiteracy - all Intel SoCs have had at least 2 years of built-in support for HDMI 2.1, like AMD since Zen3+. And DP2.0 from 2021/2022 (half version).
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51too expensiveAnother illiterate and obsessive statement, not supported by anything by technical arguments, which I have proven in practice.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51Who needs 80 GB/s for browsing?Everyone without exception. In order not to spoil the view with cloudy fonts in chrome at low ppi. To be sharp because of the idiot developers at Google, you need a ppi above about 220. This is provided on diagonals of 25 "+ only 8k panels. It is they who forever close the theme of sharp and clear fonts in Chromium-based browsers with diagonals from 23 to 32" approximately, i.e. the largest segment. Now people are just ruining their vision with blurry wrong greyscale anti-aliasing because of the idiots in Chrome's development department and the browsers on its engine.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51COVID made OEMs improve from crappy 720p to supreme 1080p, should be good enough for most usersHahaha, you are again writing utter nonsense. 90% of laptops have pathetic 720p today.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51If laptops with the latest mobile AMD chips is not available in your country of residence / region, it doesn't mean they don't exist at all.Again lies. I proved many times in various comments over a long time that in all markets there are no multiple options for competitive 15.6-17.3" models with 6600U/6800U, as well as with Alder Lake (but there are more options, which is why Intel took back almost 7% in a year market share of an inefficient AMD company, and rightly so). Even in the USA - the main market of the planet, you can't buy anything, just open a search engine. All that is interesting and adequate - "Out of Stock". Why is it so, on the supposedly laptop market that is falling like a jack, where supposedly all the warehouses are crammed with products? Maybe they're filled with crap and not what people need?
Quote from: warkold on October 10, 2022, 00:38:00Niko, nowadays, whats the best notebook with those must have?
Quote from: NikoB on October 09, 2022, 14:29:02Another bad and overpriced product from Lenovo.
What is most striking, the author of the review put as many as 92 points to the shameful screen! Pathetic contrast below 1000:1, monstrous response for "165Hz" and even no 4k resolution with high ppi and full compatibility with fhd mode to play fhd when 2.5k resolution will not have enough fps (from 60+) with miserable and strangled 3060.
The speed of the RAM is just a total shame for this model. Even in the screenshot with the characteristics of the RAM, AIDA64 DIRECTLY writes that the memory speed is expected to be around 68Gb/s (although lpddr5 6400 have bandwidth of 6400x128~102Gb/s), but even if we accept its estimate of 68Gb/s by AIDA64, the actual memory speed just monstrously low - shameful reading is only 43Gb/s!!! Write/copying only poor 50-51Gb/s, instead of the promised 66-68Gb/s, at least! At the same time, in Intel versions with Alder Lake-H, the slower DDR5 4800 quietly gives out 67Gb/s! The outdated DDR4 3200 even works faster in many models! Even my obsolete DDR4 2666 in G5 5587 gives out 40Gb/s r/w/c after my tuning with latency ~60ns vs awful 126ns in this garbage! Lenovo and AMD engineers need to make a sepuku. Do they have honor at all?
What we have - for those who take it as a universal laptop - is soldered memory, i.e. if necessary, you can't put 64Gb RAM for work/business, although memory is now cheap even in this volume. There are wi-fi antennas of disgusting quality and, moreover, some kind of shameful cheap slow Realtek, instead of Intel AX210. Intel AX210 price only 15$!
Some of the ports are clamped with a metallic bar, and some are not clamped - it creates the appearance of vibration-impact strength, and only, in reality, it is not strong.
No USB40, i.e. it is impossible to connect advanced hubs and eGPU. It shame with "top" Zen3+!
I'm at a loss for what to pay a monstrous $2600 for. Well, for $1300-1400, maybe someone will buy it at sales seasons, when Lenovo is desperately looking for buyers for this technological garbage.
Instead of making 2-3 models, but clearly decomposed into key niches - "gaming", "universal" and "portable" variants, they rivet a lot of useless crafts.
The secret to the success of a modern laptop is simple:
1. Silence in the office load and typical surfing, i.e. when the average load on the cores is not more than 25-30%.
2. Excellent contrast 4k IPS (good for work and easy switch to fast fhd mode to games/3d) screen (1400:1+), with a pixel response of no more than 10ms (minimum 100Hz VSync) on G2G/B2W. With full VRR support (24/30/48/50/60Hz mandatory).
3. Excellent full-fledged keyboard (in the case of business and universal models). Those. a full-fledged numpad with keys of normal width. Plus normal Fx keys (Esc, F1..F12) by height, as in classic desktop keyboards. Normal tactile, elastic response, quiet enough in intensive blind printing at the same time. The touchpad is already to your taste.
4. 2 memory slots (or soldered minimum 32GB from the factory without overcharging by price, exactly at the retail price of memory, i.e. the 64GB version costs +100-130$ and no more).
5. Two M.2 slots for SSD.
6. TB4.0(USB40) ports for connecting eGPUs and advanced hubs. Full version of HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps) and Display Port 2.0 (full 80Gbps / UHBR20 mode to one lane).
6. If there is a discrete card - a dedicated miniDP port or as part of usb-c, which supports G-Sync on an external monitor from a discrete card (that is, the presence of MUX) and all other options - Adaptive Sync / Free Sync, etc. .
7. Sufficient number of ports in general and key ports (with power) location at the back of the laptop.
8. Webcam at least 2560x1440p with good autofocus and light sensitivity at 60fps minimum with H264/H265/AV1/H266 hardware compression on the fly.
That's the whole secret of a successful model in the market. The profit from such a model is provided by the MASSIVE sales of batches, i.e. the ability of effective managers to ensure high and stable quality of such models, i.e. million parties. As are smartphones market. This is where the ambush lies - "effective" managers of manufacturing companies, together with marketers, are completely unskilled and do not understand the requirements of the market, mass demand. They do not have the task of improving civilization and promoting progress, they pursue a selfish private goal - to earn the maximum, regardless of the end result. The main process drank the resources of a large company, but not the real progress of civilization and movement forward, the maximum saving of resources and the ecology of the planet, i.e. durable, quality product. That's the problem...
Quote from: NikoB on October 09, 2022, 14:29:02Another bad and overpriced product from Lenovo.
What is most striking, the author of the review put as many as 92 points to the shameful screen! Pathetic contrast below 1000:1, monstrous response for "165Hz" and even no 4k resolution with high ppi and full compatibility with fhd mode to play fhd when 2.5k resolution will not have enough fps (from 60+) with miserable and strangled 3060.
The speed of the RAM is just a total shame for this model. Even in the screenshot with the characteristics of the RAM, AIDA64 DIRECTLY writes that the memory speed is expected to be around 68Gb/s (although lpddr5 6400 have bandwidth of 6400x128~102Gb/s), but even if we accept its estimate of 68Gb/s by AIDA64, the actual memory speed just monstrously low - shameful reading is only 43Gb/s!!! Write/copying only poor 50-51Gb/s, instead of the promised 66-68Gb/s, at least! At the same time, in Intel versions with Alder Lake-H, the slower DDR5 4800 quietly gives out 67Gb/s! The outdated DDR4 3200 even works faster in many models! Even my obsolete DDR4 2666 in G5 5587 gives out 40Gb/s r/w/c after my tuning with latency ~60ns vs awful 126ns in this garbage! Lenovo and AMD engineers need to make a sepuku. Do they have honor at all?
What we have - for those who take it as a universal laptop - is soldered memory, i.e. if necessary, you can't put 64Gb RAM for work/business, although memory is now cheap even in this volume. There are wi-fi antennas of disgusting quality and, moreover, some kind of shameful cheap slow Realtek, instead of Intel AX210. Intel AX210 price only 15$!
Some of the ports are clamped with a metallic bar, and some are not clamped - it creates the appearance of vibration-impact strength, and only, in reality, it is not strong.
No USB40, i.e. it is impossible to connect advanced hubs and eGPU. It shame with "top" Zen3+!
I'm at a loss for what to pay a monstrous $2600 for. Well, for $1300-1400, maybe someone will buy it at sales seasons, when Lenovo is desperately looking for buyers for this technological garbage.
Instead of making 2-3 models, but clearly decomposed into key niches - "gaming", "universal" and "portable" variants, they rivet a lot of useless crafts.
The secret to the success of a modern laptop is simple:
1. Silence in the office load and typical surfing, i.e. when the average load on the cores is not more than 25-30%.
2. Excellent contrast 4k IPS (good for work and easy switch to fast fhd mode to games/3d) screen (1400:1+), with a pixel response of no more than 10ms (minimum 100Hz VSync) on G2G/B2W. With full VRR support (24/30/48/50/60Hz mandatory).
3. Excellent full-fledged keyboard (in the case of business and universal models). Those. a full-fledged numpad with keys of normal width. Plus normal Fx keys (Esc, F1..F12) by height, as in classic desktop keyboards. Normal tactile, elastic response, quiet enough in intensive blind printing at the same time. The touchpad is already to your taste.
4. 2 memory slots (or soldered minimum 32GB from the factory without overcharging by price, exactly at the retail price of memory, i.e. the 64GB version costs +100-130$ and no more).
5. Two M.2 slots for SSD.
6. TB4.0(USB40) ports for connecting eGPUs and advanced hubs. Full version of HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps) and Display Port 2.0 (full 80Gbps / UHBR20 mode to one lane).
6. If there is a discrete card - a dedicated miniDP port or as part of usb-c, which supports G-Sync on an external monitor from a discrete card (that is, the presence of MUX) and all other options - Adaptive Sync / Free Sync, etc. .
7. Sufficient number of ports in general and key ports (with power) location at the back of the laptop.
8. Webcam at least 2560x1440p with good autofocus and light sensitivity at 60fps minimum with H264/H265/AV1/H266 hardware compression on the fly.
That's the whole secret of a successful model in the market. The profit from such a model is provided by the MASSIVE sales of batches, i.e. the ability of effective managers to ensure high and stable quality of such models, i.e. million parties. As are smartphones market. This is where the ambush lies - "effective" managers of manufacturing companies, together with marketers, are completely unskilled and do not understand the requirements of the market, mass demand. They do not have the task of improving civilization and promoting progress, they pursue a selfish private goal - to earn the maximum, regardless of the end result. The main process drank the resources of a large company, but not the real progress of civilization and movement forward, the maximum saving of resources and the ecology of the planet, i.e. durable, quality product. That's the problem...
Quote from: JayFromOF84 on October 09, 2022, 08:29:54RTX 3060 is a straight up artefact.