None of this makes any sense. How is 1.5k not worse than 1080p? I mean, the term 4k exists because the horizontal resolution is about 4k pixels. Since it measures horizontal pixels, 2k should most often be 1080p not 1440p. And 1.5k at a 16:9 aspect ratio would only be like 844p.
Lol this article is completely pointless. You get better battery life and performance from lower resolution displays, because it doesn't push the graphics processor so hard. I'm fine with resolutions as low as 600p on some devices because it rendered better performance.
It seems every article that pops up on my news feed is pro Apple with positive headlines for anything iPhone and Apple and every other electronic company has a negative article. This has been going on for over a decade. Very very odd.
It seems every article that pops up on my news feed is pro Apple with positive headlines for anything iPhone and Apple and every other electronic company has a negative article. This has been going on for over a decade. Very very odd.
What a nonsense headline, it has long been established that there is a very hard deminishing return on higher PPI's, even with phone screens that you basically hold up to your face. 1080P is plenty, I personnaly have a phone with a higher resolution and I can't tell the difference whether its set to Full HD or QHD.
It's the basic same marketing bullshit you have with TV's. Most people sitting at any reasonable viewing distance from a TV can't decern individual pixels on a 4K TV but apparently you really need 8K, cause higher numbers means more better hurr durr.
Pretty samefull for this site to propagate this nonsense..
This is completely unintelligible. I'm losing brain cells reading this. Not one single sentence makes any sense or has any relevance.