why is this article comparing 13th gen with Zen 3? Zen 3 was intel 10th gen competitier
So this is like comparing the 13900k vs 10900k

it would be fair to compare same years cpus ....how powerconsumtion/performance matters ...nobody gonna enjoy 350+w cpus ....while amd keeps it under 150w for 16cores...ofc it will 13gen will gain more power but what did it cost?....everything in this electricity shortage..."lemme start my pc--->turns whole neighbourhood off"

I don't think that Intel destroy AMD. We have to compare those cpu with same power limit. Intel and his TDP 350W is over power to home usege,its HEDT. We should compare Threadripper to 13700k/13900k.

Why is everyone fanboying over multi-billion dollar companies that do not care about you, they care about their pockets and they think with their pockets

Also what is this lame a** article comparing a old to new, like what did you even expect...

Quote from: IntelChump on August 23, 2022, 15:11:41Compare or to the 12000k

All this is another garbage article pushed by Intel marketing comparing "leaked" GEEKBENCH benchmarks to a 2 year old gen CPU. Doesn't even compare it to the 3D stack.

Actually 11000k is the competitor..

I get it.. 7600X destroys i7700K

Amd is garbage.. Always has been. Buggy gpu's. Weak a** cpu's..

Intel rapes Amd everytime.

Salty AMD fanboys allover comments section, or maybe paid bots.
Actually, all they did was release GeekBench scores.  It's the media that's doing the comparison.  Ball is now in AMDs court to release their own leaks.
This is all you got? Incapable of basic critical thinking?

This isn't a media, this a news outlet - they get paid to publish this sort of content without questioning anything.

Quote from: Julian M on August 23, 2022, 20:44:53Newer processor is faster than older one in synthetic benchmarks, we get it.

Intel is playing it wrong, as if promoting their 12th-gen chips against two-year old Ryzen 5000 ones wasn't sad enough, now they're going to yell on all roofs their upcoming 13th gen chip destroys a (will be then) 3 year-old processor?

They need a new marketing team, and fast.

Salty AMD fanboys allover comments section, or maybe paid bots.
 Actually, all they did was release GeekBench scores.  It's the media that's doing the comparison.  Ball is now in AMDs court to release their own leaks.

Newer processor is faster than older one in synthetic benchmarks, we get it.

Intel is playing it wrong, as if promoting their 12th-gen chips against two-year old Ryzen 5000 ones wasn't sad enough, now they're going to yell on all roofs their upcoming 13th gen chip destroys a (will be then) 3 year-old processor?

They need a new marketing team, and fast.

A ES sample(Genoa) at just 3.5ghz reached 1460 in this benchmark, the turbo on the 7950x is 5.7ghz... it will surely outperform the i9

Ryzen Zen 3 is not comparative with intel 12th and 13th gen. Intel 12th gen. is newer released by date and technology. Wait for Zen 4 and then compare with intel 12th and 13th gen. !!!

Compare or to the 12000k

All this is another garbage article pushed by Intel marketing comparing "leaked" GEEKBENCH benchmarks to a 2 year old gen CPU. Doesn't even compare it to the 3D stack.

You can't be serious publishing such a articles. New Intel processor can beat 2 generations old AMD. Uff.