UserBenchmark has a history of really biased behaviour. My favourite was the inlcusion of a score for Latency between core 0 and 1 and DRAM Latency to core 0.
These were the only memory metrics tanken into account and where weight so heavily in their overall comparisson that an I3 scored higher than the AMD flagships. This system obviously changed when Alder Lake had all P cores directly connected to the DRAM Controller (and thus a worse core 0 DRAM Latency compared to the predecessors).

In generell the high fluctuation of how individuell results are weight into the overall score and often weird composition of the overall score make UserBenchmark very weird.

I don't think they particularly want to favor Intel its just that they hate AMD. They lose their s*** the same way when comparing Nvidia and AMD.

Resorting to insults and slander reminds me of a little child throwing a tantrum when their favorite toy gets taken away.

Has AMD ever falsified data? So why would they lie now? What do they have to gain? They are already the market leader, they dont need to lie to crush Intel, their chips will do that on their own.

AMD is making remarkable strides forward and leaving intel in the dust.

They were the underdog for years, and now its their time to shine.

If I had to guess... maybe the benchmark heavily favors CPUs that utilize AVX512 instructions. Before the 7000-series, AMD's CPUs did not support AVX512.

If that is the case, UB's response to this result shows pretty clearly that they authored a benchmark specifically to show Intel in a positive light by leaning into AVX512 performance, and now dislike the fact that these latest AMD CPUs now support the same instruction set Intel's CPUs have.

Quote from: tatakai on August 01, 2022, 15:15:03Their perspective is fair. They labeled the weird result as marketing. The CPU entry is called advanced marketing services 7600x. And yes the news was all over the place with few urging caution

This site has demonstrated a bias towards AMD so pot kettle. It's hardly going to war

then why isnt intels 13900 named Intel marketing Devices? something is fishy

Quote from: tatakai on August 01, 2022, 15:15:03Their perspective is fair. They labeled the weird result as marketing. The CPU entry is called advanced marketing services 7600x. And yes the news was all over the place with few urging caution

This site has demonstrated a bias towards AMD so pot kettle. It's hardly going to war

In what world do you think this kind of unprofessional behavior from a review website is "fair?" And no, whataboutism isn't a valid defense; we're talking about whether their behavior is "fair," and it's not. Not that I've ever seen this kind of childish name-calling from this site.

Their perspective is fair. They labeled the weird result as marketing. The CPU entry is called advanced marketing services 7600x. And yes the news was all over the place with few urging caution

This site has demonstrated a bias towards AMD so pot kettle. It's hardly going to war

fuq pisstel and fuq userfuckmarks HA HA

Typical LuserBenchmark

Biasbench at it again.   They are upset AMD snuck a test in before they had a chance to skew their results.

Not sure if AMD trolling UserBenchmark or UserBenchmark trolling AMD fanboys.
UserBenchmark should be the bigger man, because you can't cure fanboys.

QuoteI don't expect 7600X to be >50% faster than 5600X on average. That's just unrealistic and would only proof how degenerated and biased UB's test suite is. Simply ignore UB. Forever.

At least 18% faster. With 3D or infinity cache with DDR5 4800/5200 in 5nm with higher tdp will touch easily 30%.

 Hope in a decent APU from AMD, not even with RDNA3 but same RDNA2 up to 16CU that can run on 6400Mhz DDR5 and G version can be perfect for low end consumers like me.
We lives in crazy times for ridiculous prices! 

I don't expect 7600X to be >50% faster than 5600X on average. That's just unrealistic and would only proof how degenerated and biased UB's test suite is. Simply ignore UB. Forever.

Quote from: Mangue on July 31, 2022, 12:16:29Wow. I had no idea Userbenchmark behaves like this. 9000 credibility points lost.

Really? UB has been a scam site for a long time. No one should give a sh!t about that site. 100% bias, 0% credibility.

Wow. I had no idea Userbenchmark behaves like this. 9000 credibility points lost.