Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Puzzlesolver

- July 15, 2022, 00:40:44

Is it rendering the same? TDP is not the power used so the AMD could also be using less. Seems like comparing Apples to pears.

Posted by z

- July 11, 2022, 00:57:37

Is it only me who does not understand why people use the word "beat" in the title when it is only a difference of 1-2 fps? Technically it is correct, true, but it is not accurately represent the conclusion and is not informative. I bet that most people here are expecting at least a difference of 5-10 fps after seeing the title. "barely beats" or something similar is probably more helpful.

Posted by LWT

- July 07, 2022, 19:13:21

More impressed at how close the 6800u + 680m is.

Posted by Redaktion

- July 07, 2022, 16:54:13

Even though the M2 is not specifically designed for gaming and despite the lack of optimization on the latest macOS, the iGPU in Apple's new mobile processor is still a tad faster than AMD's 25 W Ryzen 7 6800U. The M2 with 18 W TDP was able to squeeze an additional 2-3 fps in 1920 x 1200 set to medium / high / highest details.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-M2-manages-to-beat-AMD-s-Ryzen-7-6800U-in-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider.633650.0.html