Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Klaus Hinum

- June 24, 2022, 09:08:02

Thats why we show the graphics subtest in the above charts that does not include the Physics test. However, the CPU is still an important part.

Posted by Watzupken

- June 24, 2022, 03:16:34

Anytime you see benchmark results like 3D Mark, one should always consider the fact that the bench result is highly affected by the CPU used due to the "physics" test, which skews the results. So no surprises when the results of this GPU matching or exceeding that of a GTX 1060, since the CPU on this laptop is definitely a lot quicker than those 4 cores Intel processor used on that test system. Particularly 3D Mark will favour more cores in their physics test.

Posted by Redaktion

- June 23, 2022, 10:39:13

Asus just launched its first ever laptop with Arc A370M graphics. While it performs great against integrated Iris Xe and Radeon Vega, it's going to need to a bigger boost to overtake the existing Nvidia GeForce MX series and even some older GeForce GTX 1050 solutions.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Our-first-Intel-Arc-A370M-benchmarks-are-in-and-the-results-are-comparable-to-the-GeForce-GTX-1050-Ti-at-best-and-slower-than-the-GeForce-MX250-at-worst.631236.0.html