News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Yuriy
 - June 22, 2022, 08:27:06
Quote from: Anonymousgg on June 21, 2022, 15:48:43
Quote from: Yuriy on June 21, 2022, 15:17:04While having 540 FPS on 540 Hz monitory would be nice, having 240 FPS on 540 Hz monitor might be better than having 240 FPS on 240 Hz monitor. It's not only about matching HZ and FPS, but also about faster response time, lower input lag. 120 FPS on 240 Hz is better than 120 FPS on 120 Hz monitor right now. Please, don't spread such misconceptions as "having 350 FPS in Esports games, negates the need for a 540 Hz monitor altogether.

That's interesting. I'd like to see Hardware Unboxed or another reviewer look into that. But the improvements have to be weighed against the price and being stuck at 1080p.

They already did, along with all of the others tech reviewers who review high Hz monitors.
Posted by Ednumero
 - June 21, 2022, 19:30:39
Interesting. Do we know if this is 2K (~2048x...) or the ol' '2K'-mismarket (2.5K 2560x...)

EDIT: The video does right referring to QHD as 2.5K. I wonder what the website is referring to by 2K.

Neat hardware, even if it does continue to be a shame we aren't seeing more taller aspect ratios.
Posted by Anonymousgg
 - June 21, 2022, 15:48:43
Quote from: Yuriy on June 21, 2022, 15:17:04While having 540 FPS on 540 Hz monitory would be nice, having 240 FPS on 540 Hz monitor might be better than having 240 FPS on 240 Hz monitor. It's not only about matching HZ and FPS, but also about faster response time, lower input lag. 120 FPS on 240 Hz is better than 120 FPS on 120 Hz monitor right now. Please, don't spread such misconceptions as "having 350 FPS in Esports games, negates the need for a 540 Hz monitor altogether.

That's interesting. I'd like to see Hardware Unboxed or another reviewer look into that. But the improvements have to be weighed against the price and being stuck at 1080p.
Posted by Yuriy
 - June 21, 2022, 15:17:04
While having 540 FPS on 540 Hz monitory would be nice, having 240 FPS on 540 Hz monitor might be better than having 240 FPS on 240 Hz monitor. It's not only about matching HZ and FPS, but also about faster response time, lower input lag. 120 FPS on 240 Hz is better than 120 FPS on 120 Hz monitor right now. Please, don't spread such misconceptions as "having 350 FPS in Esports games, negates the need for a 540 Hz monitor altogether.
Posted by Redaktion
 - June 21, 2022, 13:27:40
AUO is alleged to be working on at least three new panel types for Esports gamers. Reputedly, the company is developing 4K/240 Hz and 2K/360 Hz options, plus a 540 Hz panel that would outpace ASUS's new ROG Swift 500 Hz.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/AUO-to-launch-a-slew-of-new-high-refresh-rate-gaming-panels-including-a-540-Hz-option.630426.0.html