Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Bluechimera

- March 19, 2022, 15:49:26

Quote from: BillShitner on March 18, 2022, 18:20:56
Stop saying Pepe is an alt right meme.

Edifying dumb crap imageboards post based on what shitty left leaning media they are reacting to is dumb. You are what makes Pepe an alt right thing just like the dumb OK sign fad. Don't feed the trolls, author.

Pepe & it's many derivatives existed before the alt right

Totally agree!
Just because someone in alt-right used Pepe, doesn't associate the character with them.

So stupid!

Posted by BillShitner

- March 18, 2022, 18:20:56

Stop saying Pepe is an alt right meme.

Edifying dumb crap imageboards post based on what shitty left leaning media they are reacting to is dumb. You are what makes Pepe an alt right thing just like the dumb OK sign fad. Don't feed the trolls, author.

Pepe & it's many derivatives existed before the alt right & still has strong cultural use outside of imageboards. Also, weird article for this website.

Posted by Johnson

- March 18, 2022, 14:07:29

this is like buying a print at an art store and then getting angry when the store restocks the shelves with identical prints except you dont get anything physical in this case. if theres no contract transferring commercial rights the creator can make and sell as many copies as they want.

Posted by WernerDJ

- March 18, 2022, 10:26:20

There is an miscoception on the base of the lawsuit. The NFT bought was indeed unique. An NFT is just a blockcain generated address pointer that tells you where you can find an image. The NFT buyer is not buying the image rights, just the pointer that points at the address of that image in a computer storage. That pointer is unique. It is weird, right, but if it is uniqueness wat you want, you can't complain if there are many pointers to a place where a picture is stored. I suppose that since the creator of the NFT, oh sorry, that is just an AI (no copyright rights then, those are only for humans), no the original owner of the NFT, promised to keep the value of the NFT by not releasing the others generated by the AI, and he did it, that is the root of the deception

Posted by Ish

- March 18, 2022, 00:30:42

Anyone who is enough of a moron to buy NFTs should get ripped off in every way imaginable. Lmao... idiots.

Posted by Redaktion

- March 17, 2022, 23:30:49

After the "Pepe the Frog" creator released 46 identical NFTs, an apparent case of buyer's remorse has now led to a US$500,000 lawsuit in which the winner of the original NFT auction accuses the creator and his organization of fraudulent inducement and unlawful business acts.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Buyer-of-Pepe-the-Frog-NFT-files-US-500-000-lawsuit-after-creator-releases-identical-NFTs-for-free.608817.0.html