Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by AJH

- February 26, 2022, 17:13:45

Somebody been messing with the white balance on their unit? No greenish tints what so ever on mine, either that or take your sh*tty green tinted Sunny's of you big dossers...

Posted by LOL

- November 24, 2021, 12:49:33

Found the triggered Sony fanboy.

Just accept that your beloved Sony's phones are inferior products.

Smartphone photography is more about algorithms and A.I these days, and Sony and its overly hyped Alpha team have absolutely zero expertise for them.

Look at Google Pixel phones. Inferior specs on paper, and yet takes consistently amazing photos. I wonder why?

Just stick to your roots of being an OEM camera sensor merchant and let the big boys make the phones.

Posted by mixedfish

- October 30, 2021, 01:13:20

Dxo is such a scam website, why are they reviewing only the display when they are a camera company and why has it taken this long?

It's fairly obvious Sony doesn't care about paying their extortion consultation fees.

Posted by Redaktion

- October 29, 2021, 23:20:11

On paper, the Xperia 1 III has an excellent display. In practice, the 4K, 120 Hz and OLED display does not get that bright. DxOMark has knocked the device down a peg or two with complaints about strong green tints, too. Accordingly, the camera specialists do not rate the Xperia 1 III's display highly.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Sony-Xperia-1-III-falls-short-of-its-competitors-in-DxOMark-s-display-test.576152.0.html