Honestly,it wouldn't be so bad if people understood how to read the results on userbenchmark. The overall percentage performance they show is useless generally to the majority of users.
Looking at the individual scoring for multi core and single core benchmarks is much more helpful.

Intel Core i9-12900HK :
Memory / 1 core / 2 core : 198pts
4 core / 8 core : 972 pts
64 core : 2131 pts

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X :
Memory / 1 core / 2 core : 190pts (-4% vs i9)
4 core / 8 core : 917 pts (-5,6% vs i9)
64 core : 2964 pts (+39% vs i9)

The AMD is 39% more powerful in multi-threading... Only 5% less powerfull on others benchs....

Conclusion : the i9 don't outbenches the Ryzen 9 ... Thanks Notebookcheck for this analysis  :(

Userbenchmark😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣

And here I was thinking notebookcheck was a good website. Userbenchmark is a joke which absolutely no one takes seriously these days. Fully agreeing with Rob Stan here, touch some grass notebookcheck.

Quote from: joe on January 26, 2022, 20:24:09
UserBenchmark is useful site for people who looking for data from real user experience, but not for fanboys who looking for ranks.

UserBenchmark isn't useful for anyone. It's 100% scam. Period.

Quote from: joe on January 26, 2022, 20:24:09
Anti-UserBenchmark crusaders here again. Even included criticism about UserBenchmark in article didn't help. :D
Complaining about some meaningless ranks there, like chip development is some kind of beauty contest.
UserBenchmark is useful site for people who looking for data from real user experience, but not for fanboys who looking for ranks.

What they get from UserBenchmark is useless garbage and shite data, lmao... that is why no one takes it seriously. Garbage in, garbage out. It gives you no basis for comparing anything because it is trash.

Quote from: joe on January 26, 2022, 20:24:09
Anti-UserBenchmark crusaders here again. Even included criticism about UserBenchmark in article didn't help. :D
Complaining about some meaningless ranks there, like chip development is some kind of beauty contest.
UserBenchmark is useful site for people who looking for data from real user experience, but not for fanboys who looking for ranks.

Ah yes, a site/"source" so ethical and honorable that even Intel communities have blacklisted it.

(there's a 75% chance that who wrote that comment is userbenchmark's owner himself, doing sone astroturf, that delusional manchild has shown to be immune to reason and criticism time and time again... I think the ":D" gave it away)

So this site has fully converted to yet another fake news outlet I see.

It's embaressing in 2022 to not know that mentioning userbenchfart in a uniornic way as a tech journalist or enthusuast means backlash and instant blacklisting from many people's tech news feeds.

Touch grass notebookcheck, touch grass.

Anti-UserBenchmark crusaders here again. Even included criticism about UserBenchmark in article didn't help. :D
Complaining about some meaningless ranks there, like chip development is some kind of beauty contest.
UserBenchmark is useful site for people who looking for data from real user experience, but not for fanboys who looking for ranks.

Yeah seriously? Userbenchmark?

When Zen 3 first launched, they listed the 5950X as #4 on the list despite beating the fastest Intel processor in every category across the board.

Userbench also lists the 3090 as being 23% faster than the 6900XT. Can list three videos from YouTube that show otherwise using a less biased algorithm. :P

UserBenchmark? Really? I thought Notebookcheck has some credibility.