Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Cifu

- December 23, 2021, 08:33:35

Take note: the RTX 2050 can be set up with DLSS, and with that the card is a hefty FHD gaming card while a low power alternative for the Navi24 and Arc 128. So try to compare to those cards. In this regard, the RTX 2050 at least not dissapoint at all...
The MX550 are going against the IGP-s, so that card have to be compare the Vega 3 and Vega 8, and the UHD5xx and UHD6xx...

Posted by NoteBookFan876

- December 22, 2021, 09:26:11

Why is this article. This post is so lame & nonsensical it makes my brain hurt. Even your bio sounds generic OMG........ ::)

Posted by heffeque

- December 21, 2021, 12:36:00

How about you compare it against the similarly priced MX450 instead.

Next news: MX550 disappointing performance vs RTX3090Ti.

Posted by Redaktion

- December 21, 2021, 01:14:50

3DMark Time Spy scores for the newly announced GeForce RTX 2050 and MX550 have leaked. The scores showcase mediocre performance. The numbers aren't unexpected since the GeForce RTX 2050 is a cut-down version of the RTX 3050. The same goes for the MX550 which is a castrated GTX 1650.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Leaked-GeForce-RTX-2050-and-MX550-3DMark-scores-showcase-disappointing-performance.588142.0.html