News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by mixedfish
 - September 24, 2021, 08:32:47
Quote from: skoda9635 on July 24, 2021, 11:10:57
Sir, you are utterly wrong.

Mi 11 Pro Geekbench - 1137 for 1core, 3785 for all cores.

Sony Xperia 1 II Geekbench - 808 for 1core, 2777 for all cores

That's almost 50% difference in comparison.

Not really, did you read this review?

Geekbench 5.2
Xperia 1 ii 898
Mi 11 Ultra 989

If this review is wrong go report.
Posted by Clavierdepixels
 - September 03, 2021, 10:21:46
I wonder why the microSD card reader benchmark section is missing in this review. Can you test the microSD card reader of the Sony Xperia 1 III? Last year's Xperia 1 II had a slow card reader, according to your benchmark :
︿
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard   34.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard   30.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)


Which is half the performance of the 2018 Galaxy S9! However, the 256GB internal storage is usually enough for most people.

AndroBench test results for my Samsung Galaxy S9 + 512GB Samsung EVO Select microSD card :
︿
Date : 2020-10-19 01:51:07

Microbenchmark
Target: /storage/2408-55D3 (sdcardfs, -)

64MB / 32768KB / 4KB / 8

SEQUENTIAL READ: 78.66 MB/s

SEQUENTIAL WRITE: 48.77 MB/s

RANDOM READ: 1868.78 IOPS

RANDOM WRITE: 567.8 IOPS

SQLite benchmark
1 / WAL / Index

SQLite Insert: 1160.99 QPS

SQLite Update: 2282.22 QPS

SQLite Delete: 1957.02 QPS


Sometimes I even get 81.69 MB/s Sequential Read and 49.94 MB/s Sequential Write.
Posted by Marky Mark
 - August 22, 2021, 06:41:58
So we have here the first Sony phone with dual frequency GPS, yet there is no test of it in this review. What happened NotebookCheck, did you have your bikes stolen or you just got lazy ?
Posted by PKIROD99@
 - July 25, 2021, 05:06:30
มันมีดีขึ้นตามลำดับไม่เหมือนใครๆให้ภาพชัดเจนสมจริงน่าทึ่ง เสียงที่เพราะๆความละเอียดสูงไม่มีตกสุดยอดมาก
ติแค่ใช้แบตหมดเร็ว ให้แบตน้อยน่าจะ5000Amขึ้น ราคาแพงไป
Posted by skoda9635
 - July 24, 2021, 11:10:57
Quote from: mixedfish on July 23, 2021, 19:08:28
If you want to see how well optimised Sony phones are you only need to look at the Xperia 1 ii Geekbench scores, basically their s865 is only a neck behind the Xiaomi 11 pro with s888.

Sir, you are utterly wrong.

Mi 11 Pro Geekbench - 1137 for 1core, 3785 for all cores.

Sony Xperia 1 II Geekbench - 808 for 1core, 2777 for all cores

That's almost 50% difference in comparison.
Posted by mixedfish
 - July 23, 2021, 19:08:28
If you want to see how well optimised Sony phones are you only need to look at the Xperia 1 ii Geekbench scores, basically their s865 is only a neck behind the Xiaomi 11 pro with s888.


Posted by geek-a-contra
 - July 23, 2021, 19:03:11
interesting, although in the camera dpt xperia, acc to the text, seems to be at least on par with the competitors, the final verdict shows the worst mark of all four. care to explain? not to mention the fact the photo quality estimations, for ALL phones, are based strictly on the eye perception of the reviewer, no objective quantification at all. very far from the last week promise of a thorough analysis....
Posted by Redaktion
 - July 23, 2021, 16:25:28
The third generation of Sony's flagship smartphone is also supposed to convince mainly with features for professional photographers. But the Sony-typical design and the high-resolution screen could also make it attractive for other users.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Sony-Xperia-1-III-smartphone-review-Camera-phone-with-variable-telephoto-focal-length.552075.0.html